WAN-IFRA

A publication of the World Editors Forum

Date

Tue - 23.01.2018


editorial direction

Text: 

With news changing every minute, why do news sites like The New York Times remain mostly unchanged throughout the day? Scott Karp writes, "Why shouldn't the WHOLE site -- especially the homepage -- be aligned with the web, instead of aligned with the static print product?"

Instead of display the news by importance, Karp suggests a blog-like method of arranging the news in reverse chronological order so viewers can read what's new. Better yet, news sites can offer different default page options like Digg: articles ranked by importance, by reverse chronological order, and by readers' favorites.

Though The New York Times and other newspapers have blogs, their links are not prominently featured on the homepage.

Karp brings up the debate of editor vs. reader discretion, and one has to question the consequences of his proposition. The New York Times certainly has the staff to constantly update their website, but hundred of new updates a day would create a chaos of news, not a well-organized news site. Also, if readers voted their favorite articles to the top, The New York Times could resemble a celebrity gossip site, which is not the purpose of news sites. The job of editors is to filter out articles so that readers get the important news, which is why news sites are arranged the way they are.

Link: 
Controls
WEF ID: 
6597
WEF URL: 
web_20/2008/03/the_new_york_times_is_not_digg.php

Author

Carolyn Lo

Date

2008-03-14 15:23

Syndicate content

Editors Weblog

The World Editors Forum is the organization within the World Association of Newspapers devoted to newspaper editors worldwide. The Editors Weblog (www.editorsweblog.org), launched in January 2004, is a WEF initiative designed to facilitate the diffusion of information relevant to newspapers and their editors.


© 2015 WAN-IFRA - World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers

Footer Navigation