<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Editors Weblog</title>
        <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>UK Minister praises standards of health and science journalism</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Despite widespread allegations of fear-mongering tendencies in British&nbsp;science and health journalism,&nbsp;the minister of science and innovation, <b>Lord Drayson</b>, has praised the high standard of reporting in this field.<br /><br />The reporting of public health issues by mainstream publications has come under heavy criticism for its inflammatory tone and exaggerated content. <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/newsrooms_and_journalism/2009/04/how_swine_flu_should_be_reported_as_dise.php">The recent coverage of the swine flu outbreak,</a> a pertinent example, has been interpreted as unnecessarily alarming. Yet, speaking at the <b>World Conference of Science Journalists </b>in London yesterday, Drayson came out in defence of the work of science and health reporters. He rejected claims that the reporting of stories such as swine flu amounted to no more than hysterical headlines, but rather,&nbsp; it&nbsp;provides an essential public service. Journalistic coverage of disease and health risks helps people make educated decisions by bridging a gap between science and the public, Drayson argued.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/uk_minister_praises_standards_of_health.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/uk_minister_praises_standards_of_health.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ethics</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Press Gazette names the best scoops in British journalism, 1922-1995 </title>
            <description><![CDATA[For its July magazine, <i>Press Gazette</i> has compiled the top 50 best scoops in UK journalism from 1922 to 1995. The original impetus for the list was <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/daily_telegraph_to_publish_supplement_on.php">the <i>Daily Telegraph</i>'s stunning work covering the MPs' expense reports</a>, and draws from suggestions by <i>Press Gazette</i> readers. <br /><br />Unfortunately, the complete rankings are only available to subscribers, but <a href="http://blogs.pressgazette.co.uk/editor/2009/07/03/best-ever-british-journalism-scoops-the-results/">editor <b>Dominic Ponsford</b> has put together his personal top five</a>, in chronological order: <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/press_gazette_names_the_best_scoops_in_b.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/press_gazette_names_the_best_scoops_in_b.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">awards</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">investigative journalism</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>US: Washington state ushers in tax breaks for newspapers</title>
            <description><![CDATA[This week, <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003990307">a tax break for newspapers in Washington state went into effect</a>, giving print publications a <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/05/washington_state_governor_approves_tax_b.php">40 percent reduction in the state business tax</a>. One lawmaker stressed the tax cut was "not a bailout." It is interesting to note Washington already offered equal exemptions to the aerospace and timber industries, both of which are critical to the state's economy. <br /><br />In a year which saw the <i>Seattle Post-Intelligencer</i> make the move to online-only and the <i>Seattle Times</i> cut 500 staff members, many publications will welcome any relief they can get. However, others wonder whether the measure will be enough to revive struggling papers and what such aid means for the publications' journalistic independence. <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/us_washington_state_ushers_in_tax_breaks.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/us_washington_state_ushers_in_tax_breaks.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Future of journalism</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">newspapers and democracy</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>WaPo&apos;s controversial dinner plans cancelled</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/thewashingtonpost.jpg"><img alt="thewashingtonpost.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/assets_c/2009/07/thewashingtonpost-thumb-300x48-3332.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="48" width="300" /></a></span>The <i>Washington Post </i>has decided to cancel its plans to host private, off-the-record dinner parties for political lobbyists at the home of its publisher after criticism from the newsroom at the suggestion that their services were effectively been sold. Publisher <b>Katharine Weymouth </b>was to host dinners that would give paying lobbyists and business leaders access to officials from the Obama administration and Congress, as well as Post journalists. <br /><br /><i>Politico</i> <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/washington_post_offers_up_politicians_an.php">first reported the story yesterday</a> after obtaining a flier promoting the events that had been given to a healthcare lobbyist. The flier was entitled "Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate" and advertised events with a maximum of 20 guests to discuss major White House policy initiatives, which participating firms could co-sponsor for $25,000 per event, with up to two sponsors per session. There was also an offer for 11 for the price of 10. The theme of the first July dinner was to be health care reform, and <i>WaPo</i> guaranteed the attendance of Obama administration officials and members of Congress as well as reporters. <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/wapos_controversial_dinner_plans_cancell.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/wapos_controversial_dinner_plans_cancell.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">editorial direction</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ethics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Washington Post</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>UPDATE: WaPo newsroom refuses to participate in paid-for dinners with lobbyists</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="thewashingtonpost.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/thewashingtonpost.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="52" width="320" /></span>In a bizarre new venture, the <b><i>Washington Post</i></b> had promised lobbyists a chance for off-the-record meetings with policy makers and newsroom staff for the price of a $25,000 sponsorship, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html">according to a flier shown to <i>Politico</i></a> by a health care lobbyist. These "<b>Washington Post Salons</b>" would consist of dinners at the home of <i>WaPo</i> CEO and publisher <b>Katharine Weymouth</b>. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0709/WaPo_responds_to_flier_controversy_.html?showall">A <i>WaPo</i> spokeperson has responded to <i>Politico</i></a>, stating, "As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this." Apparently the event planning division of the company sent out the flier advertising reporters' participation without first alerting the newsroom. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0709/Brauchli_Post_wont_participate_in_events_in_exchange_for_money.html?showall"><i>Politico</i> also obtained a copy of an internal memo</a> sent by Executive Editor <b>Marcus Brauchli</b>, reaffirming that staff members would not be taking part in the events as "Our independence from advertisers or sponsors is inviolable." <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/washington_post_offers_up_politicians_an.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/washington_post_offers_up_politicians_an.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ethics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Washington Post</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Printcasting to &quot;democratise&quot; print in more US cities through collaboration with newspaper publisher   </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="printcasting_logo.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/printcasting_logo.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="71" width="248" /></span>The <b><a href="http://community.printcasting.com/">Printcasting</a> </b>model is on its way to "democratise" print publishing in more cities in the US, it was announced last week. The initiative, financed by the winnings of the<a href="http://www.newschallenge.org/printcasting"> <b>2008 Knight News Challenge</b></a>, has made its first newspaper partnership with Denver-based<b> <a href="http://www.medianewsgroup.com/home/">MediaNews Group</a></b>. The publishing group controls 54 daily newspapers in 11 states, including <i>The Denver Post</i> and <i>San Jose Mercury News</i>.<br /><br />The project originated out of the newspaper, the<i> Bakersfield Californian</i> and first went public in March to cater for the town of Bakersfield, California.<br /><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/printcasting_to_democratise_print_in_mor.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/printcasting_to_democratise_print_in_mor.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">innovation</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">user-generated content</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Gannett to axe between 1,000 and 2,000 jobs</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="gannett.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/gannett.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="212" width="194" /></span>The American newspaper publisher <b>Gannett</b> plans to get rid of somewhere between 1,000 and 2,000 positions, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124640099819376069.html">according to an article in today's <i>Wall Street Journal</i></a>. The job cuts will hit the company's 80 local dailies, rather than <i>USA Today</i>. <br /><br />Former Gannett editor and reporter <b>Jim Hopkins</b> had previously predicted up to 4,500 slashed jobs on his <a href="http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/"><b>Gannett Blog</b></a>. He now says there will likely be 600 actual layoffs as a result of the restructuring, naming July 8 as the axe date. <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/gannett_to_axe_between_1000_and_2000_job.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/gannett_to_axe_between_1000_and_2000_job.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Gannett</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">job cuts</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>US: Readers vote for a redesign of the redesign at Hartford Courant</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="hartfordcourantpollfronts.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/hartfordcourantpollfronts.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="193" width="300" /></span>After the <i>Hartford Courant</i> <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/02/newspapers_update_their_style_several_re.php">redesigned its format last September</a>, the response to the front page's new look was extremely negative. The paper's decision to move the nameplate from a traditional, horizontal position to a vertical orientation <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=47&amp;aid=166025">displeased enough readers that management decided to do something about it</a>. <br /><br />An informal online poll asked readers to choose their preferred look for the Courant from among three options. The results overwhelmingly favored a horizontal nameplate, and the paper has since reverted to the more traditional format. <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/us_readers_vote_for_a_redesign_of_the_re.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/us_readers_vote_for_a_redesign_of_the_re.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Newspaper</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">redesign</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Report: Mainstream media leaves the British public confused and excluded?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[There is a crisis in trust and communication between the British public and the mainstream media, a new report has concluded. The gulf between public expectations of news provision and the actual nature of articles, which oscillate between esoteric or irresponsible, leaves readers feeling confused and excluded. <br /><br />The report, entitled <b>'Public Trust In The News'</b> was conducted by researchers from <b>Manchester</b> and <b>Leeds Universities</b> and was published by the <b>Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.</b> It investigated the dynamics of news production and consumption, to ascertain if there is a difference in what "the public expects from news media and what journalists mean by serving the public".&nbsp; The paper highlights the underlying causes of an apparent widespread disenchantment with the media and the detrimental effects this is having on the standards of reporting and civil participation in democracy. Thankfully, the report offers several propositions for a new journalistic direction, which could refresh the reader-writer compact.<br /><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/report_mainstream_media_leaves_the_briti.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/07/report_mainstream_media_leaves_the_briti.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">newspapers and democracy</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Journalism Online and ITZ Publishing announce partnership</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.journalismonline.com/"><b>Journalism Online</b></a> has announced that it has retained <b>ITZ Publishing</b> to lead its efforts in working with small- and medium- sized newspaper companies to maximize their online revenue opportunities. ITZ will help Journalism Online's affiliated news publishers to design marketing and packaging strategies for online subscriptions, micropayments and combined online/print subscription packages. <br /><br />It will do this by assessing audience usage patterns and hence helping the newspaper companies to build appropriate pay strategies through Journalism Online. "Greg Swanson and the ITZ Publishing team have been market leaders in developing breakthrough solutions for news publishers," Journalism Online's Co-founder <b>Steven Brill</b> said in a press release.&nbsp; Another of the co-founders, <b>Gordon Crovitz</b> commented that "The marketing and data analysis expertise of ITZ Publishing will be especially valuable to publishers in retaining a large number of unique visitors and page views online while converting many free users to paying subscribers."<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/journalism_online_and_itz_publishing_ann.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/journalism_online_and_itz_publishing_ann.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">paid online content</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>US: The great copyright debate</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Would expanding US copyright law to incorporate news articles help protect newspapers from unfair competition online? Several columnists and commentators have come out on both sides of the issue in the past week, raising questions on the role of online aggregators and the efficacy of any action regarding copyright. <br /><br />First off, <a href="http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2009/06/the_future_of_n.html">US Court of Appeals judge <b>Richard Posner</b> proposed on his blog</a> that copyright law should be changed to "bar access to copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, or to bar linking to or paraphrasing online content without the copyright holder's consent." Essentially, that would mean news aggregators like <b>Google News</b> would have to ask permission each time they linked to a newspaper article. Posner argues that traditional media lose so much revenue by these "free riders" reusing content it will eventually drive newspapers out of business. <br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/us_the_great_copyright_debate.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/us_the_great_copyright_debate.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">aggregation</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">copyright</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The death of Michael Jackson, as covered by the press </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="tmz460.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/tmz460.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="150" width="250" /></span>The media coverage of the shock death of <b>Michael Jackson </b>has served to highlight press dynamics, raising interesting questions concerning the nature of breaking news reporting, the cult of the celebrity and the relationship between newspapers and their online news rivals. Has the fact that most newspapers were delayed in the initial reporting of the death emphasised the widening gulf between print and digital channels of breaking news? Conversely, has the death been exploited by the printed press as a facile, reader guaranteeing hit? <br /><br />The news of the performer's death, in terms of rumour, confirmation and reaction has been overwhelmingly 'digital' in expression. The scoop belonged to the Los Angeles based celebrity website, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/">TMZ</a>, which confirmed the death an hour after it aired whispers of a suspected heart attack. The reporting was rapid fire: time of death: 2.26pm, LA time, time of update: 2.44pm.&nbsp; <br /><br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/26/michael-jackson-tmz-scoop"> </a> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/the_death_of_michael_jackson_as_covered.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/the_death_of_michael_jackson_as_covered.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tabloid</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Twitter</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>US: 1 in 4 young adults reads a daily newspaper</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Who says the younger generation has no interest in traditional media? More than a quarter of Americans aged 18 to 20 reads a daily newspaper, <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/media/e3i4993a5c32cf65e03561339183368ec75">according to the new <b>Nielsen</b> report "How Teens Use Media."</a> In comparison, 45 percent of all adults pick up the paper on a daily basis. <br /><br />About a third of 18- to 20-year-olds reads the Sunday paper, compared to 50 percent of all adults.  ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/us_1_in_4_young_adults_reads_a_daily_new.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/us_1_in_4_young_adults_reads_a_daily_new.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">young readers</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>When newspapers choose to withhold information: The NYT vs the Taliban and Wikipedia</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/assets_c/2009/01/new%20york%20times%20logo-thumb-250x40-1913.jpg"><img alt="Thumbnail image for new york times logo.jpg" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/assets_c/2009/03/new%20york%20times%20logo-thumb-250x40-1913-thumb-250x40-2331.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" width="250" height="40" /></a></span>In November 2008, the <i>New York Times'</i> investigative journalist, <b>David
Rohde</b>, was taken hostage by the <b>Taliban</b> not far from Kabul, the Afghan
capital, where he was conducting research for his book.&nbsp; His driver,
<b>Asadullah Mangal</b>, and local reporter, <b>Tahir Ludin</b>, were also kidnapped.
Rohde and Ludin escaped earlier this month and their freedom, say the press, would not have been possible without the self-imposed media
blackout.<br /><br />
Thanks to the efforts of <i>New York Times</i> executive editor <b>Bill Keller</b>,
for seven months news of the kidnapping did not enter the public
domain. Fellow newspapers understood that lives were at stake and
nobody was willing to compromise Rohde's safety by breaking the media
silence. "But that was pretty straightforward compared with keeping it
off <b>Wikipedia</b>," says one <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/technology/internet/29wiki.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media"><i>New York Times</i> journalist</a>.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/when_newspapers_choose_to_withhold_infor.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/when_newspapers_choose_to_withhold_infor.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ethics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">New York Times</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>WAN, IFRA &apos;Merge&apos; Into Single World-Wide News Publishing Organisation</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/logos/wan-ifra%20logo.png"><img alt="wan-ifra logo.png" src="http://www.editorsweblog.org/assets_c/2009/06/wan-ifra%20logo-thumb-160x45-3298.png" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="45" width="160" /></a></span>The <b>World Association of Newspapers</b> and <b>IFRA</b>, the leading international associations for print and digital news publishing, have merged into a new organisation, the <b><a href="http://www.wan-ifra.org/">World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA)</a>.</b>

The combined new organisation will represent more than 18,000 publications, 15,000 online sites and over 3000 companies in more than 120 countries. WAN-IFRA is dedicated "to be the indispensable partner of newspapers and the entire news publishing industry worldwide, particularly our members, in the defense and promotion of press freedom, quality journalism and editorial integrity, and the development of prosperous businesses and technology."]]></description>
            <link>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/wan_ifra_merge_into_single_world-wide_ne.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.editorsweblog.org/newspaper/2009/06/wan_ifra_merge_into_single_world-wide_ne.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newspaper</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
 