Facebook sends more traffic to broadcast sites than to newspaper sites
Posted by Maria Conde on March 3, 2010 at 12:00 PM
After examining the top 10 News and Media websites visited after
Facebook and Google News last week, the data shows that Google News
sends most of its users to newspapers such as The New York Times and
The Wall Street Journal, and Facebook sends most of its traffic to
broadcast news websites, like The Weather Channel and CNN.com.
This suggests that social networks are an important source of traffic, but they may be even more important to broadcast news sites than to newspapers. The broadcast media may also be benefiting from a boost in their audience thanks to Facebook.
Google News still takes the top spot in sending readers to newspaper websites. Last week, The Wall Street Journal received 10.37% of its US visits
from Google News, while it only received 1.41% of its visits from Facebook. The New
York Times also received more visits from Google News than Facebook,
with 5.21% and 2.96% of visits respectively.
Some newspapers complain that Google News makes money off of content it does not own without any compensation, and allows clever users to jump over paywalls without paying up.
Google News has put newspaper publishers in an uncomfortable position - should they remove their content from Google News and risk losing readers? Or should they continue to allow the aggregator to carry their content without paying a dime?
Although Rupert Murdoch has threatened to remove all of his News Corp newspaper websites from Google News, the man behind Google News, Josh Cohen, recently said at a PaidContent 2010 event that he sees the value in Google News and believes most publishers do too.
Sources: Hitwise (1), Hitwise (2)
This suggests that social networks are an important source of traffic, but they may be even more important to broadcast news sites than to newspapers. The broadcast media may also be benefiting from a boost in their audience thanks to Facebook.
Some newspapers complain that Google News makes money off of content it does not own without any compensation, and allows clever users to jump over paywalls without paying up.
Google News has put newspaper publishers in an uncomfortable position - should they remove their content from Google News and risk losing readers? Or should they continue to allow the aggregator to carry their content without paying a dime?
Although Rupert Murdoch has threatened to remove all of his News Corp newspaper websites from Google News, the man behind Google News, Josh Cohen, recently said at a PaidContent 2010 event that he sees the value in Google News and believes most publishers do too.
Sources: Hitwise (1), Hitwise (2)
Related Entries
- CNN fires veteran editor over controversial tweet
- Three-quarters of Spanish media use Facebook and Twitter
- The Economist faces controvesy over digitally altered cover photograph
- Does Twitter threaten ethical journalism?
- New York Times re-directs traffic from The Local to Baristanet
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Facebook sends more traffic to broadcast sites than to newspaper sites.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.editorsweblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/20734










Leave a comment