US: NYT digital staffers will continue to be paid less
Posted by Kelley Vendeland on February 18, 2008 at 2:08 PM
Digital staffers are still getting the short end of the stick at The New York Times, says The Newspaper Guild of New York in a memo reported on by the Silicon Alley Insider (SVI).
According to SVI, NYT and the Guild have resumed negotiations on future wages and benefits, and NYT has allegedly halted its plans to put digital and print staffers on equal footing. The Guild says that the unequal treatment stems from “various business reasons.”
Although digital staffers are arguably the future of NYT, strong labor unions have made it difficult to adapt the existing system. SVI suggests that by treating digital staffers differently, The Times is trying to maintain the digital section as an entirely different business that is subject to different pay rates.
Sources: Silicon Alley Insider
According to SVI, NYT and the Guild have resumed negotiations on future wages and benefits, and NYT has allegedly halted its plans to put digital and print staffers on equal footing. The Guild says that the unequal treatment stems from “various business reasons.”
Although digital staffers are arguably the future of NYT, strong labor unions have made it difficult to adapt the existing system. SVI suggests that by treating digital staffers differently, The Times is trying to maintain the digital section as an entirely different business that is subject to different pay rates.
Sources: Silicon Alley Insider
Posted in :
Related Entries
- US: LA Times to feature breaking news on billboards
- The press release and cost cut problem: editorial forgetting core values?
- US: protest against Major League Baseball media restrictions
- US: USA Today debuts quarterly lifestyle magazine
- US: Did Obama advertisements jeopardize newspaper impartiality?
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: US: NYT digital staffers will continue to be paid less.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.editorsweblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6174







Leave a comment