Photojournalists to disappear in light of Flickr?

Posted by Jean Yves Chainon on December 11, 2006 at 11:26 AM
Citmedia blogger Dan Gillmor, in his posting on “The Demise of a Photojournalist,” predicted that nearly all photojournalists will eventually lose their jobs. According to him, the transposition of media-creating techniques from professionals to the public, combined with the recent emergence of citizen journalism, will result in the cost-effective disappearance of photojournalists.
“I think it is inevitable,” Gillmor posted.

It does sound evident that user-generated content is gradually gaining more and more importance in the media market. The reasons, as explained by Gillmor, are simply practical: professional journalists can seldom be present at the right place at the right time, citizens now have the capacity to record content, and citizen journalism is a great way to save money for job-cutting media companies.

It may be a little too early to reach Gillmor’s stonewall conclusion though. Photojournalism is still, very much so, a growing business, and the audience wants to see quality pictures. While citizen contributions may be very useful for punctual news occurrences, Poynter Institute writer Amy Gahran insists that photojournalists will remain in business.

“Personally I think there will always be a need for professional photojournalists -- especially with the know-how, equipment, and connectivity to cover hard-to-reach or dangerous places,” said Gahran.

At the same time, citizen journalism and media-creating techniques are constantly expanding, and will eventually be available even in those ‘hard-to-reach’ or ‘dangerous’ places.

For example, Yahoo News’ novel user submission feature, YouWitness, has already proven to be a success.  “In the Wake of the Coup,” a slideshow on Thailand’s September 2006 coup is, apparently, entirely composed of user-submitted pictures from Flickr.

Then, is photojournalism, as forecasted by Gillmor, doomed? It’s too early to know, but as all professionals in the media business right now, photojournalists will have to double their efforts to prove their continued usefulness.

Source: CitMedia.orgPoynter.org

Posted in :

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Photojournalists to disappear in light of Flickr?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.editorsweblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4589

4 Comments

Charlie said:

John,

My Guvnor asked me to havea look at the article so I've translated and then given it a bit of a reworking to make it flow better.

Charlie

Alerts Vs. RSS

How is it possible that a digital newspaper that doubles it's page impressions in two months only increases their unique users by 20%, And how has the average duration of the visits altered over those two months?

The solution seems to be in the application of alerts that allow the users to automatically receive news from their preferred sites without having to visit the site. This type of system has been implemented by the sport newspaper Ace in the last two months with their news service called 'News', a similar service is also offered by ElPaís.es called Extra!

The effect of the new alerts service, from publishers Del, has meant that the page impressions of Ace have gone from 128.6 million, in September, to 257.2 million in November, according to the last data of OJD. Disproportionably unique users have only grown of 1.78 million to 2.24million, and the number visits to the site has gone from 18.1 million in September to 16.9 in November. The formula of the alert increases advertising impressions while maintaining a faithful user group, two objectives much sought after by digital advertisers. For that reason another important Internet publisher, Business Week, has recently announced a new alert applications to catch the users who do not use their RSS syndication service.

RSS is seen as an alternative model for personalisation of the information chosen by the their readers. Open, configurable RSS examples include elmundo.es, in French, Alertinfo or in the UK, The Guardian (that has relaunched their Newspoint). These RSS applications are based on the social-networks and treat information as conversations, offering open, cross-sectional opportunities to create readers, but often only between the 'super-users', who are most capable of using the technology.

But this does not mean publishers are resigned to losing their authoritative, leading, position in the 'informative-diet' of the 'non-expert'. The publisher wishes to 'hook' users to a certain type of information via regular updates and alert technology is designed specifically to highlight the evolving contents of a site. Alert technology is further aided by it's adoption by applications such as Google Desktop or My Yahoo, showing that system that push content to the user are viable and acceptable within the marketplace.

To receive contents (subscriptions, electronic mails, instantaneous messages...) in your computer, while it performs other tasks, generates a sensation of authentic multitasking in many users. While, it is still not clear how to make RSS a paying business, in spite of all the publicity in feeds, an alerts systems means reader's return to the site of origin allowing the site to increase ad revenue via better segmentation.

The Alive World-wide Network has not ended the passive reception and the battle between the old Internet and Web 2.0, human or semantic is not determined as yet. But this does raise the question are these new technologies going further broaden the gab between existing users and new breed of super-users?

Dan said:

Alerts are more likely to be picked up by readers with an existing loyal following of the publisher. While regular info served to the desktop (not just summary hooks) may drive an audience into less frequently visited sections of the site, they are also likely to push unwanted content (eg opted to receive, but ultimately unwanted, marketing info) to the desktop.

RSS feeds, by the nature of the unbranded reader/browser, are less brand associated and can invoke a feeling of brand freedom and choice in the mind of the end reader, that a desktop alert never could. The majority also pull readers back to site, saving the need to saturate the feed with contextual ads.

It is the pick and choose nature of RSS that gives the reader the flanuerie of web surfing. Desktop alerts bring a dependable subscriber that bit closer to the areas publishers would like them to visit, and their fave brands a little closer to them.

Howard said:

Desktop Alert Inc. is the true essence of desktop alert technology. One military client just used a desktop alert when the exchange email servers were down to distribute critical information. So, there are many other logistical features and benefits to consider.

http://www.desktopalert.net

At the heart of this debate resides a tension between how some people define photojournalism as a professional occupation, and how others define it has an art and self-expression. The problem is that people confuse making pictures with making money. For the average consumer of images questions of aesthetics take second-place to content, especially if the subject is recognizable. How else can anyone explain why a fuzzy and overblown picture of Angelina and Brad on a beach in Africa can command millions of dollars from an agency, while freelance photojournalists risking life and limb in Iraq make barely a living wage.

In many cases, people don't even notice compositional flubs such as a telephone pole growing out of a subject's head. The average image consumer just looks through or over looks such annoyances. What the average image consumer sees is the center of focus, even with all the imperfections. At the same time, people aren't idiots. People do recognize quality and photojournalism offers a lot of it. The conventions developed in photojournalism such as the decisive moment, framing, and layering have helped to make the craft into an art form, even in the eyes of the elite. The average image consumer, armed with a camera phone,will be hard pressed to replicate a picture made by a trained photojournalist. Unfortunately, the professional photojournalist is being outgunned in terms of the increasing numbers of people willing to send in images for publication.

There may be a day, when the average Joe or Jan with a camera phone will start to think beyond the snap shot and produce images that are not only of-the-moment. People have the capacity to learn and put knowledge into action. What we may see, then, are people making images not just of breaking news or spot news scenes of train wrecks and police beatings but also images that have aesthetic appeals as well.

This day may not be too far off, and it is this fear that is troubling many professionals. As one photojournalist argues on the National Press Photographer Association list-serve, "Hire them, and get garbage images with trees sticking out of back of heads." Another more rational professional observes, "Eventually, I want to believe, the public and marketplace will again respect that good cameras don't make good pictures. Good photographers do. And good photographers aren't necessarily good photojournalists."

What remains important to the profession as well as to democracy is the authenticity of the frame and the credibility of the individual who produced the image. As Gillmor argues, "What does matter is the utter authenticity of the image, made so by the fact that the man was there at the right time with the right media-creation gear."

A similar battle is raging in the newswriting world as well -- one in which bloggers continue to encroach on the domain of the so-called establishment press. But just because someone can blog doesn't mean they have all the facts.

If the citizen shutterbug movement does take hold, as Gillmor predicts, it is reasonable to assume that photojournalism as an art form will continue to thrive, while photojournalism as an occupational group will suffer.

As an educator, this issue raises a lot of questions. Why continue to train photojournalists in a world where just about everyone can claim they are photojournalists? What does getting a degree in photojournalism mean when the credibility of the field continues to be attacked as it did last summer during the Israel-Hezbollah conflict. What does getting a degree in photojournalism mean when opportunities for employment seem so dismal?

The best answer to this question is reconciled by the fact that photojournalism teaches us to experience and see the world in ways that few other disciplines can match. Photojournalism is the practice of being engaged in capturing and fixing moments so that we can learn and grow from those moments. What philosophy seeks to do for helping students to think more critically and ethically, photojournalism does in helping students to see, feel, and act in the world. Photojournalism is a visual response to light and life -- one that seeks to render, explain, interrogate, expose, and discover what it means to be human.

If more people, with camera phones, come to understand and appreciate the complexities of our times so be it. At issue is not the need for more people with cameras. What is needed are more people with cameras that know and appreciate the device as a tool for illuminating and edifying, connecting and communicating with the richness of our universal human condition.

Citizen shutterbugs cannot replace photojournalists entirely, but this newly created stream of images does present a few challenges to the profession. Chief among the problems with a citizen-centered influx of images for news publication is the question of credibility and authenticity. Editors seem to be having their hands full these days just making sure their own professionals are playing by the rules without the burden of checking on the veracity of Uncle Jim Bo’s pictures from the county fair. From this perspective, Gillmor's argument appears overly simplistic and reductive.
In reality, more attention must be paid to other more systemic issues facing news operations in general, and photojournalism specifically.

If photojournalism is truly dying the slow death so many seem to be predicting then we must look at the economics of an entrenched media industry that is finding it hard to adapt and cope in a faster, leaner digital world.


In the end, what appears to be happening now is that far too much energy is being expended on fretting over the loss of a professional occupation and not enough energy is being spent on creating a more informed and visually literate citizenry.

Leave a comment

Object not found!

Object not found!

The requested URL was not found on this server. If you entered the URL manually please check your spelling and try again.

If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster.

Error 404

www.editorsweblog.org
Sun Sep 7 02:24:20 2008
Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) PHP/5.2.6-0.dotdeb.1 with Suhosin-Patch
Object not found!

Object not found!

The requested URL was not found on this server. If you entered the URL manually please check your spelling and try again.

If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster.

Error 404

www.editorsweblog.org
Sun Sep 7 02:24:20 2008
Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) PHP/5.2.6-0.dotdeb.1 with Suhosin-Patch