Eli Noam: Outlook 2010: How newspapers can manage the "free generation"
Columbia University’s Eli Noam stirred up some curiosity in the media industry in 2005 prophesizing that newspapers will evolve into “news integrators.” That curiosity was sated at the 13th World Editors forum where Noam made the keynote speech.
In keeping with the theme of the “free generation”, the bearded academic reflected on Rupert Murdoch’s now famous speech at the American Society of Newspaper Editors in April 2005, saying that “Young people are not abandoning print. They are abandoning news.” In this respect, newspapers must undergo a “structural transformation” if they are to thrive in the digital age.
Noam pointed out the basic business foundations that have supported traditional news organizations for decades are being undermined and that “It is difficult to get readers to pay for news content which they can get readily for free from other providers.”
He said that “Online and print newspapers depend on each other symbiotically,” and that “Today, the online world feeds on the print world. But like a cancer, it can kill its host.”
So what can newspapers do?
- Focus on core competency
- Differentiate
- Customize
- Restructure
- Consolidate
- Innovate
After newspapers have taken these steps, Noam predicted that “four archetypes of ‘newspaper’ firms” would arise:
- Specialist content providers
- Large bundlers of small specialist firms
- Vertically integrated content bundlers
- Pure bundlers
…all of which would eventually result in a network model in which the “news organization assembles the elements it needs rather than produce them.” But at the same time, Noam emphasized the fact that just about anyone can perform this function on the Internet.
This type of network model will impact journalists, causing a de-professionalization, commodification, and more accountability. It will also affect content. Multimedia, blogs, wikis, open source, participatory media will all become an integral part of the news landscape.
In the end, Noam concluded that people aren’t necessarily abandoning news, but they are straying from classic pay plans. The plethora of media “competition for (consumers’) attention drives down prices to zero or near it.” Life for newspapers is thus becoming a lot more complicated.
Link to Noam's question and answer session
More news from the 59th World Newspaper Congress
And our video blog with Robb Montgomery and Visual Editors
1 Comments
Leave a comment
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Eli Noam: Outlook 2010: How newspapers can manage the "free generation".
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.editorsweblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6022










There is now a dangerous "editorial-reader deficit" in mass-media owned by large corporations (eg News Corps).
In the printed media, that "deficit" is the growing gap between what the reader wants to read, and what the editor/owner wants to be read.
There is no better example than on the front page of today's Rupert Murdoch's UK "Sun" ('Lady Macca Hard Core Porn Shame', June 5 2006).
Heather Mills and Paul McCartney are being subject to a "character assassination" by the Murdoch Press (via The Sun).
The Sun readers (of which there are many) do not want to read about it - most of whom feel sorry for the couple as they separate.
Just one example, of many, between the gap between what people want to read, and what the editor/owner wants read.
Richard W. Symonds
MOTIVATION ANALYST
England