TimesSelect shuts out NYT columnists from the online conversation

Posted by John Burke on November 10, 2006 at 1:47 PM
The New York Times launched its paid subscription service in September 2005 to mixed reviews, especially from its op-ed staff. This week’s free trial of TimesSelect confirmed their skepticism.

Although the Gray Lady’s editorialists realized the need to experiment with online paid models, they, as well as the vast blogosphere, many of whose conversations initiated with their essays, were also aware that their online readership would drop substantially.

A good measure of their popularity is the Times’ most emailed list. Before the paid-wall came into effect, the day’s editorials were regularly listed as the most popular stories on the site, sometimes for days or the entire week.  

After TimesSelect launched it became extremely rare to find Maureen Dowd or Tom Friedman on the list and they became increasingly perturbed at their stunted reach. Friedman even mentions his opposition to online paid-walls in his bestseller, The World is Flat.

For a while, it was fairly easy to find pirated versions of NYT opinion pieces on blogs which had copy-pasted articles; reading Paul Krugman and Nick Kristof could still be done through Technorati and the conversation, although hindered, continued. But gradually this practice became more difficult as the Times cracked down.

Before the TimesSelect launch, many blogger pundits who loved reading the Times op-ed page swore that they would not give in and purchase the plan and that the well-known commentators would disappear almost completely from the online conversation. TimesSelect Free Access Week proves they weren’t wrong.

Every day this week, I checked NYT’s most-emailed list several times a day to see how the temporarily liberated opinion writers were faring. On Tuesday, November 7, Tom Friedman made the list with a column entitled “Insulting our Troops, and Our Intelligence,” published on Friday, November 3. I watched it make it all the way to number three.

On Thursday, Dowd’s column, A Come-to-Daddy Moment, rapidly shot up the charts to number one, most likely due to the importance of the issue satirized (Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s resignation).

And that’s it. In four days of TimesSelect free trial (13 staff editorials in total from Nov. 5 to Nov. 10), only two columnists claimed the honor of most emailed, and one with a column written the previous week, not even close to the frequency the op-eders’ links were shared before the paywall.  (Four days being Monday through Thursday, I’m writing this at about 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time from Paris, six hours ahead. Dowd is still at number one and I realize that perhaps I am jumping the gun seeing as Friedman and Krugman could make this list over the course of Friday).

From this anything-but-scientific research, I can only conclude that TimesSelect has seriously handicapped the scope of its once most popular writers. For instance, being a follower of everything newspaper, I was well aware of the publicity stunt. Before the paywall, I used to read the Times’ columnists religiously. After the paywall, I didn’t. And quite frankly, I didn’t miss them that much because there is so much alternative quality opinion on the Web be it from newspapers or blogs. And since they are not part of my daily habits anymore, I didn’t read them for free this week either. I’m sure I’m not the only one.

It’s time for the Times to ask itself, “Is the nearly $10 million (a substantial but not extraordinarily significant sum considering NYT’s revenues), that TimesSelect (reportedly) brought in during its first year worth the loss of such prestigious influence?”

If not, will online subs last?



Ps. If any readers notice if more columnists make the most emailed list today, please let us know.

Pps. I realize I didn’t check the “Most Blogged” list so if anyone had any stats on how many of the columnists or TimesSelect content in general made that list, we would love to have that info. Thanks.

 

Update: Paul Krugman's piece, The Great Revulsion, about the US midterm elections sat at number 5 on the most emailed list as of 11:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on Friday, Nov. 10. Dowd was still in the top spot.

Update II: 6:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, Saturday November 11: Krugman's piece hits number one, Dowd is at number two, and Friedman's Friday article, "Chine: Scapegoat or Sputnik," at #9. In total, 4 TimesSelect op-eds have made it to the most emailed list during this free trial week.

Final update: 11:45 a.m. Eastern Standard Times, Sunday November 12: Frank Rich has made the list at #4 with 2006: The Year of the 'Macaca'". Dowd remains at #3. 5 op-eders have made it to the most emailed list this week. 

Expect this number to drop significantly starting on Monday, when most people won't be able to read them without paying.  

 

Posted in :

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: TimesSelect shuts out NYT columnists from the online conversation.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.editorsweblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5865

6 Comments

Uriel said:

Let's not forget that some China blog censorship is done at the behest of freedom-loving Americans -- see http://urielw.com/bosco.htm .

MFred said:

People get into (and when blocked by lack of subscription) out of habits. If the Times writers continue to write at the highest levels, and they were offered to everyone again, they'd slide back into the readers' daily routine, including the e-mailers.

Kempton said:

Hi John,

I think I found my long lost twin in you. (smile) I felt like you were typing exactly what I thought (see quote #1 below). I used to be a big fan of Maureen Dowd, Tom Friedman, sometimes Paul Krugman, and some other times Nick Kristof. But since the TimesSelect paid-wall went up, I stopped reading them all. I know I would have a ton of fun reading Maureen and pick up some great insight from Tom, but I simply switch to Washington Post and the many other good blogs/news sources on the web. And I didn't miss them. I still enjoy watching Maureen or Tom on Charlie Rose once in a while.

(quote #1) -- "Before the paywall, I used to read the Times’ columnists religiously. After the paywall, I didn’t. And quite frankly, I didn’t miss them that much because there is so much alternative quality opinion on the Web be it from newspapers or blogs. And since they are not part of my daily habits anymore, I didn’t read them for free this week either."

I re-read what you wrote in the quote in "quote #1" again. My thought is that even if this is the first day of that free week, I probably still won't bother to go read Maureen or Tom again. I think I have lost faith in NYT a bit. I can see through this "free this week" thing as yet another tactic to try to hook me again. Well, thank you very much NYT, I have moved on. Of course, if NYT wants to make its site permanently free again, may be I will slowly move back to read. May be NYT needs to adopt the Economist ads model, I don't.

Thanks for blogging about this.

Cheers,
Kempton

Vin Crosbie said:

TimesSelect is a sop to New York Times Company Chief Financial Officer Janet Robinson. It's purpose is to satisfy her beliefs that people should pay for The New York Times' online content and that people will pay (her first belief leads to that second belief).

Of course, her beliefs are demonstrably false: Ms. Robinson saysthat the USD 10 million in revenues TimesSelect generates is proof that her beliefs are true. However, the fact that te premiere newspaper in the English-language is unable to charge for the majority of its online content and is able to generate more than USD 10 million annually from charging for its columists and archives is a quite clear demonstration that people won't pay and shouldn't have to pay.

The TimesSelect content would earn more than USD 10 million annually if it were offered to everyone for free. TimesSelect is a failure, as are Ms. Robinson's beliefs

Dan Blank said:

Great overview on the topic. I wonder about the effect of removing yourself from the online conversation on the younger generation. Kids, teenagers, and young adults are very connected and building strong online information gathering habits now. Companies such as the New York Times could find that they have shot themselves in the foot, as younger readers age, and don't pick up the Times as a major source of news and opinions in their lives. Or, maybe they will...

USuggest said:

USuggest.com allow the bloggers to make some extra money through recommended products directly from within their blogs, and hopefully directing their readers to online retailers. As such, the respective blogger would receive a commission from any sales generated through referrals!

Leave a comment