Results matching “poland new down”

Mecom, a 'content and consumer business' under David Montgomery, publishes 25 million newspapers per week across Europe; thrice as many as the UK's Johnston Press. In 2007 the company's share price plunged a disastrous 97 percent due to weak advertising and debt, an unfortunate turn of events the news publisher been struggling to recover from ever since.

Trading up yesterday however, revealed an altogether brighter outlook for the publisher of some 300 titles, its share price jumping 14.8 percent, topping the FTSE Small Cap .FTSC leaders board.

When newspapers run community events, it's important to stay committed to the convictions of the paper, says Marcin Gadzinski, editor of Sport.pl/Gazeta Wyborcza in Poland, speaking at the WAN-IFRA conference 'Using sports news to optimise your revenues'. Get that right first, and profit will follow, he adds.

His paper, which runs some sporting events, is no. 2 in Poland in terms of circulation, and likes to get involved in social issues and public advocacy campaigns. People all around Poland work for the paper, so it's helpful to use their contacts to organise activities.

They were not very successful when putting sports content on the web, he says, so in 2007 Sport.pl was launched, a strictly internet sports brand. They added online-only features rather than seeing it as a way to promote newspaper content. In 2009 the paper jumped from the number 5 to the number 2 sports website in Poland, with 5 million unique users a month. Plus, every Monday the paper publishes a Sport.pl-branded section.

Mecom, a Europe-wide 'content and consumer business' under David Montgomery, reported an 18% fall in advertising revenue in the four months preceding November. The company owns over 300 newspapers and claims a readership of 20 million per week.

French telecoms operator Orange announced on Wednesday that it is to expand its online news aggregation service to countries outside France. 2424actu aggregates French language text, television and radio content, working in partnership with news organisations just as Agence France-Presse, RTL, RFI, Le Monde and Le Figaro, AFP reported.

AFP quoted Laurent Frisch, head of media at Orange's division for internet innovation, NexT.com, who said that the company is considering "expanding into other countries, in Europe or elsewhere. We envisage going into countries where the media and advertising markets allow us to make such a service work." He suggested the UK or Poland as examples. 

Thinking about setting up a team of mobile journalists? Don't buy them expensive equipment. Let them use their own phones. That's the advice of Pawel Stremski, Chief editor of the integrated online newsroom at Gazeta.pl and radio TOK FM in Poland. "What's the best phone for a MoJo? His own.

The next World Young Reader Conference in Prague in September will look at the "Total Youth Think" approach that is being adopted by newspapers looking to ensure a future audience of young people. The conference is one of the first to be conducted under the merger of the World Association of Newspapers and IFRA.

The "Total Youth Think" approach should aim to "create post-Internet print content combined with smart digital approaches, directly engage young people and those who influence their media loyalties, while at the same time avoid alienating older readers," according to a press release. Speakers include:

• - Anne Kari Jacobsen, Chief Analyst for A-Pressen Group in Norway, who will discuss how that group's local newspapers have used a wide array of strategies,
• - Grzegorz "Greg" Piechota, Special Projects Editor for Gazeta Wyborcza in Poland, which is conducting a strategy to "link generations" in the newspaper
• - Boris Trupčević, General Manager for 24sata in Croatia, who will examine how the youth-led company became the market leader with a newly launched newspaper and website, and completed its multimedia strategy with a news TV channel.

Today marks the 20th anniversary of the first free elections to be held in Poland, which ended communist rule on the 4 of June, 1989.

To celebrate this landmark, the majority of Polish dailies have changed the logotype to resemble the logo of the Solidarity movement, which twenty years ago successfully fought for democracy in Poland. The announcement was made in a press release from the publisher Agora.

The proposed merger of two Polish dailies and the launch of an entertainment version of a political weely, both intended to conquer a new public and consolidate readership, have raised some doubts in the Polish newspaper industry.

Poland's largest business and legal daily Gazeta Prawna (87,000 paid circulation) will merge with the second quality news daily Dziennik (147,000 readership), in a 51/49% partnership between Infor Biznes and Axel Springer, their respective owners. The transaction, which will result in a combined newspaper strong in economics on one side, and politics, culture and sports on the other, is still subject to approval by the authorities.

A new portal supported by the European Commission "aims to get EU citizens across the 27 member states talking and reading about the same issues" by translating selected articles from 250 of the continent's newspapers into 10 different languages. Titles such as France's Le Figaro, Spain's El Pais and the UK's Guardian will be involved in the project, which will employ 10 journalists and receive €3 million of EC funds per year.

The site is lead by Courrier International, along with Internazionale in Italy, Forum Polityka in Poland and Courrier Internacional in Portugal, and hopes to have all 23 of the EU's official languages involved within the next five years. EU communications commissioner Margot Wallstrom explained that the site will "broaden, enrich and expand coverage of European affairs," allowing Europeans to read European coverage from other nation's perspectives, instead of being limited to their own national newspapers.

Jacek Utko, a newspaper designer, talks about how the industry may be saved through strong designs, using his redesigns of Eastern European papers as an example. Although he says it was not the design alone that improved the paper, it was an enhancement of the entire product that did. Circulation increased 29% in Russia, 35% in Poland, and an incredible 100% in Bulgaria he said.

Utko talked about his initial frustrations with newspaper designing and how Cirque du Soleil inspired him because he saw how they took "a creepy, rundown form of entertainment and turned it into the highest level possible of performance." This is when he realized that newspapers could do the same.

European institutions must take action to tackle the current media crisis, according to Aidan White, general-secretary of the International Federation of Journalists, EUObserver.com reported. "The future of the media must be at the core of the new commission's agenda, at the core of the new parliament's agenda," he stressed. White added that he would like to see a top-level taskforce perform an intensive review of the European media landscape, "looking at questions of content, politicisation, relations with the public and the question of funding."

EUObserver.com reported that European broadcasting is undergoing a "counter-reformation," according to a report by the Open Society Institute. The Institute presented its survey of the European broadcasting landscape in Brussels on 18 March, in which it detected a "backsliding towards overt political control" in contrast to the post-Cold War period, when leaders relaxed their grip on TV and radio.

SUMMARY
- Presentation
- How to participate in Editors Weblog Webinars
- Participant payment confirmation and access
- Participant Questions and Answers information
- Webinar archives
- Telephone access country codes

Presentation
Editors Weblog Webinars include:
1. a 15-20 minute presentation by guest speakers
2. 40-45 minutes of Questions and Answers with participants

How to participate in Editors Weblog Webinars
Participants need:
1. a computer and Internet connection to watch the presentation
    a. Participants must click on the URL sent in the confirmation email (see below)
    b. enter the access codes sent in the confirmation email
2. a telephone to hear the presentation
    a. participants must call the phone number related to their region (see telephone access    codes below)
    b. after calling the number, participants must enter the access codes sent in the confirmation email
    c. For quality reasons, the Editors Weblog has chosen classic telephone service over Voice Over Internet Protocol

Participant payment confirmation and access
1. Editors Weblog Webinars participants can pay via the Web by clicking on the "Buy Now" button for the webinar they plan to attend
2. After payment has been accepted, participants will receive a confirmation email including additional information such as access codes for the webinar
3. Any additional questions that participants have can be addressed to World Editors Forum Deputy Director, John Burke at jburke - at - wan.asso.fr

Participant Questions and Answers information
Throughout the webinar, participants can type questions via a chat function that will be moderated by the Editors Weblog. Questions that are not answered during the webinar will be answered after the webinar has finished and the answers will be sent via email to webinar participants.
Participants also have the chance to ask questions to guest speakers before the webinar begins:
1. Login to the Webinar
2. Type questions into the "chat" function on the welcoming screen (see diagram)
   

Webinar archives
Webinars will be recorded for archival use. Participants can access the archives of the webinars they attend with the original access codes sent in the confirmation email.

Telephone access country codes
Please dial for access approximately 5 minutes before the start of the webinar by using the number listed below closest to your geographical location followed by the "access code" provided to you on the confirmation email you receive.
 
   Australia, Melbourne:       +61 (0)3 8623 7271
   Australia, Sydney:          +61 (0)2 8223 9086
   Austria, Vienna:            +43 (0)2 68220 59209
   Belgium, Brussels:          +32 (0)2 789 8658
   Brazil, Sao Paulo:          +55 11 3351 7064
   Canada, Montreal:           +1 514 315 7877
   Canada, Toronto:            +1 416 915 8534
   China, Beijing:             +86 1051 478 724
   China, Shen Yang:           +86 24 62668115
   Czech Republic, Prague:     +420 239 014 036
   Denmark, Copenhagen:        +45 32 71 42 36
   Estonia, Tallinn:           +372 616 0350
   Finland, Helsinki:          +358 (0)9 2319 3957
   France:                     0811 655 205
   France, Paris:              +33 (0)1 70 99 43 46
   Germany:                    01801 003 792
   Germany, Berlin:            +49 (0)30 7261 67304
   Germany, Cologne:           +49 (0)221 6501 0744
   Germany, Dusseldorf:        +49 (0)211 5407 3981
   Germany, Frankfurt:         +49 (0)69 71044 5442
   Germany, Hamburg:           +49 (0)40 809 020 866
   Germany, Hanover:           +49 (0)511 9361 2695
   Germany, Munich:            +49 (0)89 2444 32967
   Germany, Stuttgart:         +49 (0)711 4908 13321
   Greece, Athens:             +30 210 969 6465
   Hong Kong, Hong Kong:       +852 3011 4647
   Hungary, Budapest:          +36 1777 9008
   Ireland:                    1890 719 961
   Ireland, Dublin:            +353 (0)1 4860894
   Israel, Tel Aviv:           +972 3721 9276
   Italy, Milan:               +39 023 041 0371
   Italy, Rome:                +39 064 523 0513
   Japan, Tokyo:               +81 (0)3 5767 9394
   Latvia, Riga:               +371 6778 3994
   Lithuania, Vilnius:         +370 5205 2807
   Luxembourg, Luxembourg:     +352 2487 1023
   Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur:     +60 (0)3 6207 4093
   Netherlands, Amsterdam:     +31 (0)20 794 8450
   New Zealand, Auckland:      +64 (0)9 912 2154
   Norway, Oslo:               +47 2316 2326
   Pakistan, Karachi:          +92 (0)21 783 5436
   Poland, Warsaw:             +48 (0)22 331 0551
   Russia, Moscow:             +7 495 646 5132
   Singapore, Singapore:       +65 6622 1112
   South Korea, Seoul:         +82 (0)2 3483 7068
   Spain, Barcelona:           +34 93 545 2240
   Spain, Madrid:              +34 91 790 9570
   Sweden, Stockholm:          +46 (0)8 5051 3879
   Switzerland, Geneva:        +41 (0)22 592 7702
   Switzerland, Zurich:        +41 (0)4 3456 9607
   UK:                         0845 359 0086
   UK, Belfast:                +44 (0)28 2533 0024
   UK, Edinburgh:              +44 (0)13 1460 0026
   UK, London:                 +44 (0)20 7153 9922
   UK, Reading:                +44 (0)1 1837 00016
   USA, Houston:               +1 832 209 2909
   USA, New York:              +1 347 366 9559

Google News announced that it has struck a deal with eight European news agencies to host their content and to display advertisements around their stories. The ads will also run alongside content from the agencies whose content Google already hosts: AP, the AFP, the UK Press Association and Canada Press. Google started to display ads next to search results on Google News US in late February, but it was unclear if the move would spread to outside the US. The ads will be contextually relevant, as they are on Google news US.

News agencies EFE, which services Spain and Latin America, LUSA (Portugal and Brazil), Keystone (Switzerland), APA (Austria), PAP (Poland), MTI (Hungary), ANA (Greece) and Belga (Belgium) have all struck news content hosting deals with Google. They are all members of the European Press agency.

German retail brand "Metro" is considering suing free paper group Metro International following its victory in Hungary.

Hungarian Metro was forced to change its name to Metropol following a lawsuit launched by the German retailer. It successfully argued that the Hungarian newspaper"s use of the name was an infringement of its copyright.

Business website, B2B Köln, reports that it is looking at the French and Italian markets first.
Other contested markets could be Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Russia, Belgium, the UK and Poland.

The German Metro Cash & Carry group has been in the market for 40 years, while the free newspaper group has been in operation for just 13 years.

A court in Hamburg has taken already barred Metro International from publishing under the "Metro" title in the German market.

Metro Cash and Carry is part of the Metro Group. Other brands are Makro, Media Markt, Saturn, Galeria Kaufhaus and Real.

Source: Newspaper Innovation via IFRA Executive News Service

Poland's most popular newspaper, Fakt, launched a new weekly edition for immigrants living in Ireland.  The print run will begin at 13,000 and be distributed in the cities of Dublin, Cork, Limerick, Galway and Waterford.

The 32-page weekly will come out every Thursday and will include news from both Ireland and Poland.  

According to Poland's prime minister, Donald Tusk, the paper "will allow expatriates to keep in touch with their roots."  

Other Polish language publications in Ireland include StrefaEire, Polska Gazeta, Polski Herald and Polski Express.

Source: Irish Times

Wiktor Moszczynski, the press officer for the Federation of Poles in Great Britain (FPGB), showed concern over the negative image that the country's Polish immigrant community has been given in the "conservative" and  "anti-European" newspaper the Daily Mail, reported Le Monde. 

Earlier this year, the FPGB complained that the Mail was promoting "negative emotions and tensions between the new EU immigrants and local communities". In addition, the FPGB mentioned that the paper was publishing headlined that were "anti-Polish", wrote The Guardian.

The Mail denied the accusation and a spokesman said that the paper wrote a lot of positive things about the Poles.

"We do reserve the right to criticise bogus asylum claims, benefit cheats, tax dodgers and militant fanatics no matter where they were born," said the spokesperson.

The FPGB protested to the Press Complaints Commission and after negotiations, the Mail removed or re-wrote some of the content from its website.

The FRPGB mentioned that it was "pleased" that the paper would be more careful and that it "realized" that some of the wording may have been "harmful", according to Moszczynski.

Moszczynski said that even if the paper didn't mean to defame the Polish community, some of the articles "did just that", reported The Guardian.

Source: Le Monde, The Guardian

Poland's Metro, a free daily paper, has launched a new design to increase credibility and look more like a quality paper.  

"The masthead shrunk to the size of the title, while every front page now opens with two 'horizontal' stories: one with a 'story-telling' picture," reports the Newspaper Innovation blog.

The paper is also rolling out a major advertising campaign to benefit from the buzz about the redesign.

Source: Newspaper Innovation

The Polish free daily Metro will debut its new layout on 8 August, the same day as the opening of the Olympic Games.

The new design will feature more pictures and and is targeting young readers. The newspaper wants to become a platform for public debate, and be more transparent.

Source: Publicitas

A "furious letter" was written to Mecom chairman David Montgomery by seven editors-in-chief from the Netherland's biggest regional newspaper publisher, Wegener, describing how worried they were about the future of their newspapers.

Wegener's editors are worried that job cuts will take place in their titles as well and hinder the editorial quality of their papers. Last year, Mecom took an 87% stake in the group.

"The employees are under extreme pressure. There are not enough people, resources and incentives to achieve product differentiation quickly in order to achieve the necessary large-scale success in the multimedia field," the editors stated in the letter.

"As the editors-in-chief, we would like to stress that our papers are not just an economic product.

The concerns of the Dutch editors echo similar situations in many countries where newspapers have been faced with declining ad revenues. Their letter serves as an important reminder that cutting costs and stripping newspapers of their resources can be more detrimental than helpful - editorially and commercially.

"We are also a cultural element, and this is the key factor in the core value of our product. The newspapers are more than an information provider for the inhabitants of the relevant regions - they are a bearer of historical and cultural awareness and social cohesion."

Mecom owns many titles in Europe, such as in Norway, Germany, Poland and Germany, including the "prestigious" Berliner Zeitung, where some 30 journalists positions were cut.

Although Mecom refused to comment on the letter, a senior official mentioned that the situation has improved since it was written and that issues like "local responsibility for publishing" will be resolved soon, the Guardian reported.

Source: Guardian Online

See also:
Mecom grows European assets
Montgomery buys Dutch shares

 

The Editors Weblog is running a series of exclusive interviews about the future of journalism with top editors at leading newspapers around the world. Here is the latest installment with Dan Bogler, Managing Editor of the Financial Times in the UK.

Click here to view all interviews in this series. Other titles include The New York Times, the Guardian, Fairfax Media, the Hindustan Times, etc. (full list at the bottom of the interview).


Questions: "News, journalism, newspapers: same past, different futures?"


- How long do you think you will define your company as a newspaper company or a print company?

We see ourselves as a news organization and we're becoming much more agnostic about our distribution channels. We're becoming much more interested in creating relevant information for our readers and much less interested in how it gets to the readers. Pearson, the parent company, clearly is an education company with a print publishing arm and an information division, which includes the FT. At the FT level, we consider ourselves to be a financial news business more than a newspaper. Our mission is to be the gold standard for global business news in print and online - and in any other formats.

- At this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, a panel of futurists claimed that print newspapers wouldn't exist by 2014. To what extent do you agree with this?

Largely but not completely. 10 years from now - 2014 may be slightly too short a time frame - we will still have printed newspapers, because people like reading  things in print. Newspapers, just like the book, are convenient to read in places you can't do with a computer; but my belief is that a lot of what will be printed will be analysis, comment, analysis and opinion. The actual news will be more or less online or in other more timely formats. In a way the FT will split in two, with FT.com for all the news that's breaking and some immediate reactions and  opinion. The more considered analysis will be almost an Economist-type publication. Maybe it wouldn't have to be broadsheet anymore, it could be tabloid or even magazine format. To put it very crudely, you'd have all the news online, and you'd have 12 pages of Martin Wolf the next day in print, and all the editorials, columnists, features and more.

- In journalism's multi-centennial history, do you view the emergence of digital journalism as part of the continuity, or as a complete breakaway with previous forms of journalism?

There's one thing that's old and one thing that's new. What's old and part of the continuum is that traditional companies are going online. Our journalists are now fully integrated and write online and in print. I'm sure that in 2 years time they'll all be carrying video cameras. We've gone from zero videos website to over 100 per month in the last 18 months. That's part of the continuum: it's us doing the same thing in different distribution channels.

What's new is the blogosphere, citizen journalists and the idea that anyone - people who are not qualified journalists, either experts in a narrow field or just interested citizens - can start a blog or website and distribute it. For the FT, you would think it's negative in the sense that there's more news and opinion and more competitors. In fact, that's not really true, it almost enhances the position of leading media brands for several reasons. One is we are trusted, people believe the news they read with us. Secondly, we select and edit, which becomes an increasingly crucial function as there is more information out there. The more 'over-informed' people are, the more likely people who want to know what's actually going on will turn to a few sources that tell them what s actually important. That's what professional newspapers do really well.

- Do you believe in the increasingly active role of the user in the news process, and is it a threat or an opportunity for professional journalists?

I do believe in their increasingly active role of users: very often readers are more informed than us. If you look at an old format like the letters page in the newspaper, the amount of expertise that our readers have, who are often professionals in the City, is just incredible. They know more about it in certain aspects than our journalists. That's why we get CEOs, academics, lawyers, heads of accountancy firms and more writing in to us to say what's actually happening. They can do this online with comments or take part in Q&As, or print their views in the pages of the FT and FT.com. That sort of content is very helpful. We also have a function for any user to comment on the website's stories.

Is it a threat? Sure, to some extent. But as long as it's happening on our site or in the pages of our newspaper, it's been bundled, monitored, checked for quality and therefore is important. We're not going to turn into a place where we just repeat hundreds of readers' letters and have no journalists of our own. It's more of an opportunity for our journalists to become more informed and build contacts among readers. And it's amazing that all these readers are willing to give this information for free.

- Do you consider the Golden Age of investigative journalism is already past, or just beginning?

I don't know. That's a really hard one. I might say it's already past.

There's so much more information out there and it's so much harder for companies to hide information. Take the Northern Rock story, which was broken by BBC journalists, and there was a bank run as a result. It's harder to hide information. The idea that journalists have to do long-term, deep, undercover investigations where they reveal something months later - I don't think it works like that anymore. Journalists still have scoops and still break important stories, but it tends to be in a much shorter time frame. It tends to be a single development that they're breaking rather than a long series of connections.

But frankly, newspapers and media organizations are under pressure. It's hard for us to send a journalist or a group of journalists off three months investigating something - and if nothing works that's a shame but nevermind. We don't have resources to let people go off and do that for such a long time. I think The Golden Age of journalists working undercover, developing sources and breaking big scandals is less likely; but revealing news that people don't want out there, on a short term basis, uncovering a scandal and having it come to light, that's more likely. As soon as a tiny thing breaks now, it gets distributed so quickly that it's hard to see a journalist working undercover for a long time and gradually piecing something together without having it go public much earlier in the process.


Stay tuned for more interviews in our series. Among the other titles that have been asked to participate in these interviews are:

- The New York Times - Jonathan Landman (US)
- Financial Times - Dan Bogler (UK)
- Guardian (UK)
- Washington Post - Jim Brady (US)
- Globe & Mail - Ed Greenspon (Canada)
- The Times (UK)
- The Economist (UK)
- Gazeta Wyborcza - Jaroslaw Kurski (Poland)
- Le Monde (France)
- Die Welt (Germany)
- The Hindustan Times - Pankaj Paul (India)
- Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
- JoongAng Ilbo (South Korea)
- The Age / Fairfax - Mike van Niekerk (Australia)
- The Nation - Pana Janviroj (Thailand)
- Punch (Nigeria)
- El Tiempo (Colombia)
- Clarin (Argentina)
- Gulf News - Abdul Hamid Ahmad (UAE)

The Editors Weblog is running a series of exclusive interviews about the future of journalism with top editors at leading newspapers around the world. Here is the latest installment with  Jonathan Landman, deputy Managing Editor of The New York Times in the US.

The list of upcoming interviews will be updated as they are published (click here to view all interviews in this series). Among the other titles that have been asked to participate in these interviews are:

- The New York Times - Jonathan Landman (US)
- Financial Times (UK)
- Guardian (UK)
- Washington Post - Jim Brady (US)
- Globe & Mail - Ed Greenspon (Canada)
- The Times (UK)
- The Economist (UK)
- Gazeta Wyborcza - Jaroslaw Kurski (Poland)
- Le Monde (France)
- Die Welt (Germany)
- The Hindustan Times - Pankaj Paul (India)
- Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
- JoongAng Ilbo (South Korea)
- The Age / Fairfax - Mike van Niekerk (Australia)
- The Nation - Pana Janviroj (Thailand)
- Punch (Nigeria)
- El Tiempo (Colombia)
- Clarin (Argentina)
- Gulf News - Abdul Hamid Ahmad (UAE)

Questions: "News, journalism, newspapers: same past, different futures?"

1 -      How long do you think you will define your company as a newspaper company or a print company?

We're a news and information company, not just a newspaper or print company. We own newspapers, obviously, and they remain extremely important. But we also own Web sites, not only www.nytimes.com but also www.about.com and www.boston.com and others. The Web sites are growing smartly. They are also contributing a steadily increasing share of the company's revenue -- 11 percent at the end of 2007.

 2 -    At this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, a panel of futurists claimed that print newspapers wouldn't exist by 2014. To what extent do you agree with this?

I doubt it. Big U.S. papers like The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal still have a lot of loyal readers who like the feel and experience of a newspaper. I imagine newspapers will survive until the perfect electronic substitute comes along and combines the portability and readability of a newspaper with the connectivity and multimedia capabilities of the Web.
When will that happen? Place your bets.
 
3 -     In journalism's multi-centennial history, do you view the emergence of digital journalism as part of the continuity, or as a complete breakaway with previous forms of journalism?

Both. Digital journalism combines brand-new things with time-tested old ones. The most pronounced change is in the realm of reader interaction -- technology has made it possible for journalists, outside experts and other readers to talk to each other, to collaborate on news-gathering and analysis, to fact-check and to distribute journalism in new ways. It has pulled the newspaper package apart, allowing people to acquire and consume their journalism one piece at a time or to customize it to fit their needs. It has altered the journalist's relationship with sources and introduced new visual forms like the interactive graphic. It has picked up the journalistic pace.

Those are big changes. Still, the things that haven't changed are just as important as the things that have. Good journalists must still know their subjects. Ambitious and resourceful reporting are as essential to good news video as they are to good news writing. News judgment -- shorthand for a complicated, unscientific and very human professional assessment of what's most important, interesting, surprising, funny, educational and otherwise worth knowing about -- retains its value.

4 -       Do you believe in the increasingly active role of the user in the news process, and is it a threat or an opportunity for professional journalists?

An opportunity. See above. For us, figuring out how to mobilize our sophisticated, curious and well-informed audience in constructive ways is both a challenge and a high priority.
 
5 -       Do you consider the Golden Age of investigative journalism is already past, or just beginning?

There's no doubt that financial pressures have driven many newspapers to cut back on investigative work. But that is distinctly not the case at The New York Times. Here are (also here, here, here and here) just a few important examples to illustrate the point.

The decline of investigative reporting at newspapers can't be a plus for democracy. On the other hand, the Internet has made public records and other documents much easier to find, expose and examine. It has made it easier for fine independent journalists like Joshua Micah Marshall to find an audience for excellent investigative work that would otherwise not gain wide public attention. And it has made it easier for whistleblowers and others to find and reinforce each other.
 
In those ways it has expanded opportunities for professional journalists to work with other people to expose wrongdoing and explore important issues. I'd say this form of collaborative investigative journalism is still young and has much potential.

6 -       Can journalism survive newspapers? (And maybe can newspapers survive journalism?)

Commentators and prognosticators have been predicting the imminent demise of newspapers for at least 15 years. A famous example: In 1993 in Wired Magazine, Michael Crichton wrote: "To my mind, it is likely that what we now understand as the mass media will be gone within 10 years. Vanished, without a trace." The New York Times, he said, will be the GM or IBM of the 1990's, "the next great American institution to find itself obsolete and outdated while obstinately refusing to change."

Nine years later, the media critic of Slate, Jack Shafer, noted that Crichton had been wrong and took a stab at explaining why. His concluding paragraphs:
"As the wise man once said, if you're going to make predictions, make a lot of them. Folks will forget your misses and remember your hits. In that spirit, Crichton writes, 'Sooner or later a lot of people are going to say, "You know what? An editor is worth the money. Because time is money, and my time is wasted combing through this junk. I'll pay someone to do it." And it'll happen.'

"To my ears, though, that still sounds like the New York Times."


Stay tuned for more in our interview series: the next installment will feature Financial Times' Managing Editor Dan Bogler.

The Editors Weblog is running a series of exclusive interviews about the future of journalism with top editors at leading newspapers around the world. Here is the latest installment with  Abdul Hamid Ahmad, Editor-in-Chief of Gulf News, based in Dubai.

The list of upcoming interviews will be updated as they are published (click here to view all interviews in this series). Among the other titles that have been asked to participate in these interviews are:

- The New York Times - Jonathan Landman (US)
- Financial Times (UK)
- Guardian (UK)
- Washington Post - Jim Brady (US)
- Globe & Mail - Ed Greenspon (Canada)
- The Times (UK)
- The Economist (UK)
- Gazeta Wyborcza - Jaroslaw Kurski (Poland)
- Le Monde (France)
- Die Welt (Germany)
- The Hindustan Times - Pankaj Paul (India)
- Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
- JoongAng Ilbo (South Korea)
- The Age / Fairfax - Mike van Niekerk (Australia)
- The Nation - Pana Janviroj (Thailand)
- Punch (Nigeria)
- El Tiempo (Colombia)
- Clarin (Argentina)
- Gulf News - Abdul Hamid Ahmad (UAE)

Questions: "News, journalism, newspapers: same past, different futures?"

How long do you think you will define your company as a newspaper company or a print company?

Gulf News cannot be pigeonholed as either a newspaper company or a print company. It is a content provider. This means that it supplies news to print, online, radio or any other required medium. The organization will survive and sustain in this role that is its core functionality. We do have commercial printing facilities but our focus will always be news, irrespective of where it is published.

At this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, a panel of futurists claimed that print newspapers wouldn't exist by 2014. To what extent do you agree with this?

I strongly disagree with this point of view. Firstly, more than two thirds of the world doesn't have internet access; it perhaps has some limited access to television, which leaves print or newspaper as the main medium for receiving news. While circulation may be plateauing and in some cases declining in the West, it continues to increase in Asia and Africa for the aforesaid reasons. If internet has to make an impact, there would need to be development in infrastructure, increased investment, better education and other facilities in place. So the decline in Europe and America is compensated by growth in Asia and Africa for newspapers. The year 2014 is very close; I definitely do not see newspapers losing its significance by then.

In journalism's multi-centennial history, do you view the emergence of digital journalism as part of the continuity, or as a complete breakaway with previous forms of journalism?

Digital journalism is part of the continued journey of journalism. When television arrived, people heralded the doom of radio. Today, radio is doing very well and moving from strength to strength. One form of media helps another. Technology has helped journalism evolve and we need to adapt to the changes.

Do you believe in the increasingly active role of the user in the news process, and is it a threat or an opportunity for professional journalists?

Readers or users are the support system of the journalistic process. There wouldn't be any value to our work without them. Nobody can function in isolation. The increasingly active role of the reader/user in the news process is an opportunity not a threat for professional journalists. We should use the chance to educate readers so that the quality of interaction could be more professional. Ultimately there will always be amateurs and professionals in the world; people need to choose who they deal with.

Do you consider the Golden Age of investigative journalism is already past, or just beginning?

The Golden Age of investigative journalism is just beginning. As our world shrinks with increased connectivity and people's access to information increases, they are no longer satisfied with the superficial. They want more... they want to know in depth. They want to know what lies beneath the surface.

Can journalism survive newspapers?

Journalism is not dependent on newspapers for its survival. It existed from the time man learnt to communicate through images, words and sounds. Its root or seed lies in speech. When a tribesman climbed atop a rocky outcrop to call out to his people - that was journalism, he was giving them information. Among ancient Arab civilizations, poets functioned as journalists. They conveyed political messages, news, propaganda and other information through poetry. So journalism has existed for a while. Today it has found a home in print, online, television and radio. In the future it will find other means, but survive it will. Journalism will exist as long as man can talk.


Stay tuned for the next week's interviews, which will include The New York Times and the Financial Times.

The Editors Weblog is running a series of exclusive interviews about the future of journalism with top editors at leading newspapers around the world. Here is the latest installment with  Jaroslaw Kurski, first deputy editor-in-chief, Gazeta Wyborcza in Poland.

The list of upcoming interviews will be updated as they are published (click here to view all interviews in this series). Among the other titles that have been asked to participate in these interviews are:

- The New York Times - Jonathan Landman (US)
- Financial Times (UK)
- Guardian (UK)
- Washington Post - Jim Brady (US)
- Globe & Mail - Ed Greenspon (Canada)
- The Times (UK)
- The Economist (UK)
- Gazeta Wyborcza - Jaroslaw Kurski (Poland)
- Le Monde (France)
- Die Welt (Germany)
- The Hindustan Times - Pankaj Paul (India)
- Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
- JoongAng Ilbo (South Korea)
- The Age / Fairfax - Mike van Niekerk (Australia)
- The Nation - Pana Janviroj (Thailand)
- Punch (Nigeria)
- El Tiempo (Colombia)
- Clarin (Argentina)
- Gulf News - Abdul Hamid Ahmad (UAE)


Questions: "News, journalism, newspapers: same past, different futures?"

1. How long do you think you will define your company as a newspaper company or a print company?

We stopped being a newspaper-only company in 1993 when we launched our first internet discussion board. Today we have millions of boards. Our web portal website Gazeta.pl reaches now 6 million unique users per month. It is a magic figure, as it is also the total number of readers of the printed edition of Gazeta Wyborcza.

We started our company in 1989 with a newspaper, but today we are one of the leading multimedia companies in Central and Eastern Europe. We publish newspapers, magazines and books, we run networks of radio stations and an outdoor company.

And we strongly invest in digital media. Our board has an ambition that in three years time more than half of our revenues will come from other sources than print. Until now all our websites reach 44 per cent of internet users in Poland. This is an extraordinary outcome for a newspaper publisher like us.

2. At this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, a panel of futurists claimed that print newspapers wouldn't exist by 2014. To what extent do you agree with this?

Futurists like bold predictions, but as a journalist I prefer to look at facts.

Since 2003 there have been seven new national printed daily newspapers launched in Poland. So we faced a new competitor every single year. Is this rush any sign of weakness of the printed medium?

I believe that as long as we have something important to say and people here care to listen to us and talk with us, Gazeta Wyborcza will exist. The message is important, and the dialogue; and not the channel.

If print becomes irrelevant, we will spread our ideas in any other way. Newspapers will not die, they will change.

Last but not least: a Polish word for a newspaper - "gazeta" - does not have any "paper" in it. So even if futurists are right and print newspapers will disappear, Gazeta will remain.

3. In journalism's multi-centennial history, do you view the emergence of digital journalism as part of the continuity, or as a complete breakaway with previous forms of journalism?

Journalism is about intelligible conveying of news and about telling stories of importance that move the community. I appreciate digital tools, they are great and helpful, but they are tools only. You still need a story, a teller and a community. So has anything really changed in journalism?

4. Do you believe in the increasingly active role of the user in the news process, and is it a threat or an opportunity for professional journalists?

This active role is more than welcome. Let me give you some recent examples from Gazeta Wyborcza.

Since 1996 we have been reviewing maternity wards in Polish hospitals; we wished to improve a quality of healthcare in our country. We could have sent there 100 journalists, but a single mother - who really gave birth in any hospital - can tell you more than reporters. So we asked young mothers for help. In 1996 we got 2000 (two thousand) letters by post. In 2006, thanks to the internet, we gathered 40 000 (forty thousand) personal reviews. We were able to review 423 or 96 % of all hospitals in Poland. We would not be able to do this without our readers.

When we recently reported a huge migration of Poles to the Western European countries after Poland joined the EU in 2004 - we asked readers for help. Hundreds joined our reporting effort.
When we called for saving Rospuda, a wild river in North-Eastern Poland that was sentenced to death by the government - we asked readers for support and thousands marched in the streets, hundreds protested on the spot.

When we discussed a crisis in pensions system - we asked readers for advice and published the best investing guides ever.

We see interaction with readers not as a column of letters on page number 86. It is about inviting readers to play a crucial part in the editorial process.

5. Do you consider the Golden Age of investigative journalism is already past, or just beginning?

Investigative journalism is a core of our editorial practice and as our world and lives become more complex, I see the need for this kind of public service rising.

We live in the world flooded with information, but it is served in bites, so many bites, that it is getting harder and harder to see the whole picture. We need wise journalists to solve this puzzle.
We live in the world of instant news, but it is often reaching only the surface of problems and challenges that we face. We need great journalits to show what was NOT on TV and the net. We need to understand what really happened.

We live in the world influenced more and more by professional public relations; it changes the way politics is done. We need clever journalists to see what's behind the curtain, to ask the hard questions, to watch hands of those in power.

We live in the world of global economy and large corporations that affect people's lifes and business. We need investigative journalists to provide us all with reliable information to make better decisions.

On Monday (March 10) we broke an exclusive news about a Catholic priest who reportedly sexually abused young boys and about three bishops who - although informed and alerted about the abuses - have been reluctant to investigate the case for 13 years! We publish Gazeta Wyborcza also to uncover stories like this.


Thanks to Kurski for sharing his views. And stay tuned for the next interviews in our series.

The Editors Weblog is running a series of exclusive interviews about the future of journalism with top editors at leading newspapers around the world. Here is the latest installment with Pana Janviroj, President of The Nation in Thailand.

The list of upcoming interviews will be updated as they are published (click here to view all interviews in this series). Among the other titles that have been asked to participate in these interviews are:

- The New York Times - Jonathan Landman (US)
- Financial Times (UK)
- Guardian (UK)
- Washington Post - Jim Brady (US)
- Globe & Mail - Ed Greenspon (Canada)
- The Times (UK)
- The Economist (UK)
- Gazeta Wyborcza - Jaroslaw Kurski (Poland)
- Le Monde (France)
- Die Welt (Germany)
- The Hindustan Times - Pankaj Paul (India)
- Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
- JoongAng Ilbo (South Korea)
- The Age / Fairfax - Mike van Niekerk (Australia)
- The Nation - Pana Janviroj (Thailand)
- Punch (Nigeria)
- El Tiempo (Colombia)
- Clarin (Argentina)
- Gulf News - Abdul Hamid Ahmad (UAE)


Questions: "News, journalism, newspapers: same past, different futures?"

- How long do you think you will define your company as a newspaper company or a print company?

We're evolving quite fast. For our mass circulation newspapers, it will be a while (that they are still considered print). But I think our company will be multimedia in the near future, in the next five years, maybe it will be closer to 50-50 in terms of print and digital revenue. Right now print is still up over 80%.

- At this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, a panel of futurists claimed that print newspapers wouldn't exist by 2014. To what extent do you agree with this?

I think print newspapers will still exist, but maybe in different forms. They may evolve to become freesheets, because free papers still have many readers and offer effective advertising - advertising on the digital format isn't as effective. The paid-for newspaper may become very rare. In the (longer) future, the format will still be the format of the newspaper, but the carrier itself will change to mobile or e-paper.

- In journalism's multi-centennial history, do you view the emergence of digital journalism as part of the continuity, or as a complete breakaway with previous forms of journalism?

Continuity. It won't be a breakaway. People still need help choosing the news and finding an angle. Content will come in video form, etc., but the compilation of news will not change. Reporters will do more things than they do now, but the news angle will remain. If you look at today's world, there are actually more consumers of news thanks to the Internet and TV.
But the problem is that newspapers don't make as much money as these media. The economics of the Internet will drive changes in newspapers after a while, because Internet advertising in newspapers is still only 7% of revenue. In 5 years time, it might be 15%, but not much more. Newspapers online might end up being part of commercial sites such as Google or Ebay. A news website alone will not generate enough money.

- Do you believe in the increasingly active role of the user in the news process, and is it a threat or an opportunity for professional journalists?

Yes, it's an opportunity to widen the range of news. but user-generated content is not always news. It can be used other ways, as a comment or in a forum. Of course, when you open up to the mass, you will get a share of news stories, but there's a limitation to it.
Is it a threat? If you look at the phenomenon of reality TV, you'd call it a threat to (traditional) TV drama shows, but reality TV won't replace drama. UGC enables newspapers to have more journalists without having to hire more reporters. It will change the ability of journalists to cover certain areas.
The problem of UGC is that it needs a lot of editing, and it needs a (specific) channel to go out. I don't see at this point any very successful example of a citizen journalism site. UGC has a place, but it's still not an overwhelming media channel at the moment.

- Do you consider the Golden Age of investigative journalism is already past, or just beginning?

Neither. Investigative journalism is a job that always has been and there will always be more investigative journalism to be done. The problem will be whether the newspaper or website can afford to hire investigative journalists. I don't know. Maybe the Internet will allow individual investigative journalists to do their work and get paid for it. I don't think the digital format will affect the need for quality journalism though: there will always be a shortage of quality investigative journalism.


Stay tuned for the next interview in our series.