Results matching “what women want 1”

From today, web users will be able to access more than two million pages of 19th and 20th century history by browsing a selection of 49 British and regional newspaper titles, courtesy of the British Library.

Included in the collection are archives from the Graphic, an illustrated weekly publication which ran from 1869 to 1932. Writing on October 13 1888 after the Jack the Ripper murders, one journalist said: "To the general public it is some comfort to reflect that the late atrocities were aimed at a particular class, and that their object was not robbery. Educated persons, who have many interests and subjects of conversation, can, perhaps, scarcely realise the impression made by these occurrences on poor and ignorant people, whose lives are usually monotonous and uneventful."

Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger and Labour MP Tom Watson go head-to-head on Twitter, as Watson and the Daily Mail accuse the centre-left paper of going too far. Last week, the newspaper went ahead with a front-page editorial urging the British PM Gordon Brown to resign.

Daily Mail obsessed with idea of Guardian 'putsch' (in collusion with BBC?). A question of media ethics, apparently. http://tiny.cc/7Wp3M"

And so went the tweet that started it all, with Rusbridger linking to the Daily Mail article, in which Stephen Glover asks "Was it [the Guardian] trying to orchestrate events so as to secure the resignation which it had called for in its editorial?"

Pess freedom in Italy has come under international scrutiny in recent weeks as a down-grading of the press's freedom status by US non-profit Freedom House has coincided with an increase in prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's aggression towards media outlets which oppose him. Leading left-leaning daily La Repubblica has even attempted to take on the premier directly, publishing a list of questions concerning his relationship with a young girl, to which it believes he owes answers. A Dutch politician has threatened to take action in the European parliament against the Italian leader because of journalistic constraints. Should a newspaper be demanding such information which concerns a politician's private life? Is the press freedom situation as bad as it seems?

The La Repubblica crusade

On May 14 La Repubblica journalist Giuseppe D'Avanzo published ten questions directed at the prime minister concerning his involvement with 18-year-old Noemi Letizia. Berlusconi's relationship with the girl gained mass media attention when, four days after the prime minister dropped in on the girl's 18th birthday party in Naples, his wife issued a press release accusing him of "consorting with minors" and pressing for a divorce. Berlusconi promptly went on a late-night political chat show to defend himself, but the holes in his story which have gradually emerged have attracted even more attention than the original incident. D'Avanzo's questions address these holes and ask the premier to come clean about the nature of his encounters with the girl. Berlusconi has not yet answered the questions and has given no indication that he intends to. The paper has put a timer on its website to indicate the days, hours, minutes and seconds since the questions were issued, and even offers them in English.

Berlusconi himself has tried to present the left-leaning paper's campaign as a left-wing plot to undermine his authority, accusing the paper of lying and adding in an interview on TV-channel Sky that he believes many readers will abandon the paper because of this. His office issued a statement saying referring to the "campaign of denigration" and saying that the paper is driven by "jealousy and hatred."  The prime minister has fought back as the story developed, with his lawyers applying for the seizure of photos taken at his Sardinian villa (where Letizia reportedly attended parties with other young women) before they could be published, and a journalist from Berlusconi's brother's Milan-based daily Il Giornale posing as a member of the foreign press to get an interview with Ms Letizia's former boyfriend in an attempt to discredit him.
 
 
The international reaction 
La Repubblica has defended its actions, with editor Ezio Mauro saying that "There are contradictions here and when the powers that be don't explain something, journalism has a job to do." And foreign journalists seem to agree. The paper also featured an interview with Bill Emmott, former editor of the Economist, who said that "for a newspaper, asking a political leader questions is not only legitimate, but part of its mission to inform the people." According to the International Herald Tribune, "for the first time in recent memory, the Italian press is shining a bright light into the dark recesses of a politician's personal life." The Times wrote that the premier's campaign against La Repubblica "looks ominously like an attempt to cow dissent rather than protect a private reputation" and that "his newspaper critics are performing a public service for a badly governed populace." A Financial Times editorial criticised the way that Berlusconi turned on La Repubblica following the questions, and stressed that part of the "danger of Berlusconi... is that of the media sapping the serious content of politics, and replacing it with entertainment."

Berlusconi has reacted with anger and scepticism to such foreign criticism. He seems to refuse to believe that papers might be acting of their own accord, announcing that "the international press's campaign is being orchestrated by an Italian group" and referring to it as a left-wing "plot." He insists that the foreign press is misrepresenting the Italian situation, and a rift in his relationship with Rupert Murdoch seems to be further deteriorating following the Times' article and others. He has accused the Times of writing critical editorials about him because his government is in dispute with News Corp. Il Giornale, owned by the prime minister's brother Paolo, ran a story discussing the FT editorial entitled "The left has also enlisted the Financial Times."

One of a newspaper's main goals should be to act as a watchdog over the government, but it is unusual for a paper to take on a country's leader so directly, particularly over a matter which is largely private. In the UK, the Daily Telegraph's recent campaign over MPs' expenses was firmly in the public interest, as it dealt with public money being used by members of parliament for personal gain. Berlusconi has been derisive of the media discussing what he says is his private life. Should a paper be putting so much focus on an issue that is arguably unrelated to the prime minister's ability to govern the country? Is this indicative of media trivialisation?

The Times editorial does not see the questions as intrusive, as they relate to Berlusconi's "public roles as politician and media magnate". The Independent's Peter Popham said that the media "cannot be accused of muck-raking on the issue because it was Mr Berlusconi himself who drew attention to the relationship" by attending the 18-year-old's party and not only posing for photographs but publicly giving the girl a 6000euro gold necklace. And the fact that a politician might have lied to the public is probably enough of an incentive to investigate.
 
Press freedom in Italy
 
Italy has a fairly unique media situation, which makes confrontation between a newspaper and the prime minister even more pertinent. The country's press freedom status is clearly in question. A Dutch politician who is leader of the Green Left party in the European Parliament, Judith Sargentini, has said that her party is considering taking legal action against Berlusconi because of the press freedom constraints in his country. Amongst her complaints is the fact that the premier blocks critical questions at press conferences. If a majority of the European Parliament were to agree to the initiation of legal proceedings, then the matter would come before the European Court of Justice.

US-based nonprofit Freedom House recently downgraded Italy's press freedom status from 'free' to 'partly free' for 2008. In conversation with Karin Karlekar, editor of the report, she explained that the main reasons given for this were the unusually high level of media concentration, particularly in broadcasting, threats from organised crime and others, and attacks on journalists, mainly from far right groups. During Berlusconi's former term as prime minister, the country was also given partly free ratings, and Karlekar added that the media concentration was "one of the highest levels anywhere in the world."

Daria Gorodisky, a veteran Corriere della Sera journalist who is also a union representative for the paper, told the Editors Weblog that she believes there is a "truly enormous press freedom problem in Italy" which will be "extremely difficult to resolve." She does not place blame for this directly on the government but on the fact that there are no "pure" newspaper owners, rather, those who publish newspapers also run other businesses and therefore have aims and interests aside from their papers. She also believes that the quality of Italy's journalism schools have deteriorated as more and more have sprung up. She did, however, point out that this is not the first time that Berlusconi has threatened the press.

Internet penetration is low in Italy in comparison to that of its Western European neighbours: about 48%, compared to 72% in the UK or 66% in France, for example. This low figure would suggest that many people are more likely to get their news from television and one or two newspapers, rather than the range of sources that online readers might visit. Despite this, however, Karlekar noted the country's "very vibrant and influential" blogosphere, particularly politically-orientated blogs.

Gorodisky commented that although some journalists were "very worried" by the situation, she did not think that there was enough widespread concern about Italy's press freedom status. Karlekar said that her organisation's report had sparked considerable debate and she had received both praise and hate mail from Italians. Niccolo Ghedini, lawyer to Berlusconi, dismissed the report on a TV show called Anno Zero, saying it was a private organisation and took its information from only two sources, La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera. Karlekar responded that she was "not sure where he got that" and was clear that "the range of sources is large and our authors would never just rely on one or two." She added that it was "interesting that the government felt compelled to respond in some way."
 
Karlekar did say that Berlusconi did not seem to be "exerting the same amount of influence over the broadcast media" as he did during his previous term as prime minister; there seems to be less "overt political manipulation." She was also clear that she did not think that the high media concentration had "stifled" the whole media, and drew attention to the diversity in terms of political opinion in the print sector.

Arguably there are far more important questions that the Italian press could be asking its country's leader, rather than focusing on the somewhat sordid details of his involvement with a teenage girl. But as a vital part of the press's role in a democracy is to play watchdog on the government, the fact that a paper is challenging the prime minister to clear up inconsistencies is something that must be welcomed. And even though the original issue may not be crucial in itself, the other questions it has brought up concerning use of government planes for private use, for example, are very pertinent. Given how much of the media the prime minister does control, and the fact that even the journalists who do not currently work for Berlusconi know that they may well some day, the press freedom situation could undoubtedly be worse than it is, and it is important that journalists keep fighting.

The proposed merger of two Polish dailies and the launch of an entertainment version of a political weely, both intended to conquer a new public and consolidate readership, have raised some doubts in the Polish newspaper industry.

Poland's largest business and legal daily Gazeta Prawna (87,000 paid circulation) will merge with the second quality news daily Dziennik (147,000 readership), in a 51/49% partnership between Infor Biznes and Axel Springer, their respective owners. The transaction, which will result in a combined newspaper strong in economics on one side, and politics, culture and sports on the other, is still subject to approval by the authorities.

According to a recent poll just out, media employees count amongst England's heaviest drinkers.A survey carried out by the Department of Health found that media professionals drank about twice as much as the recommended allowance - an average of 44 units per week, instead of the suggested 21-28 units for men (depending on build), and 14-21 units for women. This is the equivalent of more than 4 bottles of wine or more than 19 pints of beer.

In response to criticism from some of the UK's leading journalism pundits, editorial staff who
work on East End Life, a weekly newspaper based in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, have penned a passionate letter defending their right to work for council-run newspapers, according to the Guardian's Roy Greenslade referring to a post on blog site FleetStreetBlues, which in turn says the letter was originally sent to the National Union of Journalist's (NUJ) Journalist magazine.

Even niche and humor media are suffering with the current crisis as we see The Onion has been forced to close its San Francisco and Los Angeles editions. The free weekly daily saw a circulation of 60,000 and 50,000 in each city respectively.

According to a new book published by Dr Andrew Cook, Jack the Ripper was an invention created by journalists to boost sales. Historian Andrew Cook claims that the murders of several women in Victorian London were the work of not one man, but of various men involved in a spate of unrelated attacks.

In his book entitled "Jack the Ripper: Case Closed," Cook draws on the evidence and accounts offered by police and medical experts at the time to argue that there were too many differences in the style of the killings to suggest that all the victims died at the hands of the one same man. Among the testimonies supporting this view include one from assistant police surgeon Percy Clark, based at the Whitechapel Division. Clark, who had unparalleled access to all the victims, told the East London Observer in 1910: "I think perhaps one man was responsible for three of them. I would not like to say he did the others."

In front of an audience of 40 people on Wednesday afternoon, new media came face to face with old media. Arianna Huffington, founder of the online only Huffington Post, and Pulitzer prize winning Linda Greenhouse, a former New York Times journalist, met to discuss the differences between print and online journalism.

Greenhouse described a typical day at the beginning of her 30-year career at the NYT, where she used a typewriter and gave copy to her editors on carbon paper - a system which she now describes as a "dinosaur of a news operation". Speaking of her departure from the NYT, Greenhouse also revealed that being asked to do additional online-only reporting was one of the factors. She disliked the immediacy which has become integral to journalism, largely as a result of its online transition.

Despite his grim predictions last year that display-ad revenues would plummet this cycle, Gawker Media head Nick Denton reports increases in the company's ad revenues and blog traffic for February 2009. In a memo to his staff posted on Poynter Online by Jim Romanesko, Denton reveals that the sites' traffic has improved by 34% over last February, ad revenues are up a fifth over last year so far, and reader comments have multiplied and improved.

Denton calls the news a "chink of light" in a somewhat gloomy media climate and attributes the Gawker Media's success to the popularity of its new big ad units and to the concentration of web traffic to fewer and larger sites. The company has cut costs by selling properties Gridskipper, Idolator, Wonkette and Consumerist last year, consolidating Gawker Media brands under Gawker.com, and laying off staff.

So forget online-only, not-for-profit, paid online content, subscriptions, free dailies and all those other ideas currently being flung at the ailing printed press.  Bill Shein has had enough of them and the result is a whole new - and frankly a whole lot more fun - list of suggestions to put newspapers back on track.  

That age-old problem of inky fingers after flicking through the morning news, he asks? Easily solved with flavoured ink,  a suggestion similar to Jon Stewart's narcotic newsprint.  Or why not take it a step further with entirely edible pages.  A martini flavoured Bond review, or a football game report that tastes of hot-dog.  To make sure readers buy the following day's edition is easy: just don't tell them what happens at the end of a story.  'Who Shot JR?' style mysteries.

With these suggestions newspapers would taste better and contain cliff-hanging content, so how to make them look better is the next step.  The answer is simple apparently; front page nudity. Print half of all daily editions with 'Page One Girls', and the other half with 'Page One Guys'.  Then turn paperboys into full-scale concierges who deliver direct to your bed and also provide breakfast.  Finally, add mind-reading Web 2.0 products to find out what online readers want and complete consolidation of publications - so that there would be no option but to read.  Follow these simple steps and the perfect newspaper is born, Shein concludes.

Source: Editor & Publisher

With the takeover of the London Evening Standard by Alexander Lebedev confirmed, his son Evgeny has spoken out about their vision for the publication.  The younger Lebedev has been appointed senior executive director by his father but will play a part time role in the running of the company, due to his having no experience in the newspaper industry.

"The plan is to have more serious coverage of the arts and culture and to engage Londoners more, and more coverage of events in London," he said, speaking to the Media Guardian. "Business and City news will also be extended. [Finance] is very important in these difficult times."  Lebedev also revealed plans to invest £25m in the Evening Standard over the coming three years, and asserted that the Russian duo will not be interfering in the Standard's conservative political stance.  Attempts to beef up the long-standing newspaper are in order to distinguish it from, and compete with, the two free London evening publications: the London Lite and the London Paper.
 

Unlike many major newspapers across Europe and the United States who are jumping on the integration bandwagon, Le Figaro has kept its print and online operations separate and intends for them to stay that way. It is, however, working hard to develop its website and keep up with online trends, as well as investing in printing plants. The Editors Weblog spoke with Bertrand Gié, Director of the department of new media at Le Figaro and Luc De Barochez, Editor in Chief at Figaro.fr, to get a better understanding of the paper's unique strategy for print, online and new media.

Strategy: Le Système Figaro

According to De Barochez, Le Figaro is unique because integration is not its objective, it has no interest in fusing print and online together.  De Barochez explained that it was a matter of specializing in two different types of media; to him print journalism is something entirely different from online journalism.  "We think that the web journalists have a specific job, that the Internet is a specific media and it's a new type of journalism that is developing - a multimedia journalism. Journalism for the daily paper is something completely different," De Barochez told the EW.  At Le Figaro, although print and online journalists work closely together, they remain independent of one another.

Investing in print    

This separation echoes the universal strategy of Le Figaro; they believe in both media and strongly support the development and integration of new media and their website, however they also believe that print is a core foundation of the brand.  Gié confirmed this belief when he described the construction of a new printing plant in the north of France due to open in September of this year.  Last year they completed a new plant in the south of France; their aim this time around is to recreate the same thing in the north, but also allowing them to "produce a brand new Figaro with a new format, and significantly reduce printing hours."

Gié went on to explain what a monumental investment this is; "In an epoch where everyone talks only of online editions and the disappearance of paper, we are, without a doubt, the only group in France to have constructed two new ultra-modern plants.  So it is very important to understand that there is a strong investment in new media, but that doesn't mean that the paper is dead."  Of course, as Gié confirmed, there is a lot of work involved in making a paper profitable while retaining its high quality, "there were a few layoffs in 2008, but that's doesn't signify the end of the paper, we are not abandoning our paper, absolutely the opposite."

Newsroom

The newsroom of Le Figaro's paper edition is made up of nearly 300 journalists, while just 30 work for the online edition. De Barochez described the layout of the web newsroom: it is a large open space is divided into four sections, economy and finance, women, sport, and news (which covers everything else, including managing the homepage).  The online newsroom is in the same building as the daily paper, allowing them to communicate easily with the print journalists.

The website

Figaro.fr was relaunched in 2005, before then, according to Gié, "it basically didn't exist," with only five people working on the site and no clear strategy of how to develop the content.  Now, Figaro.fr is the number one site in France with 5.3 million unique visitors per month, leading second place Le Monde with 4.4 unique visitors monthly.  Gié explained that the goal was for the site to be the biggest and most comprehensive portal, so they combined all of the sites and publications of the Figaro Group on Figaro.fr.  

Together but not connected

According to De Barochez, much of the online content comes from the print version and magazines owned by Le Figaro.  Although the print and online journalists work separately, they collaborate fairly often.  The print journalists are not required to write for the website and have the choice to place their articles online or not.

 De Barochez explained the different ways in which the work of print journalists goes online. Firstly, an article written for the print version could be simply reproduced online.  Secondly, when exclusive, breaking news is obtained by a print journalist, they would collaborate with the online department in order to put the news up quickly.  They write a short summary and go back and produce a more in-depth analysis.  A third possibility concerns Le Figaro's online video content, which is all created and edited in-house at its television and editing studio.  For example, a print journalist will interview a person for an online video, or a print journalist will be interviewed on a certain subject that he or she is a specialist in.

Integration

Gié acknowledged that building the website and all of its content was a lot of work, but they did it "step by step," never forcing print journalists into the realm of new media, rather allowing them to voluntarily adapt and work in collaboration when they wished.

Gié maintains that the key to successfully integrating the site into the daily workings of the newspaper was to produce a high quality website that remained independent from the print version.  "We were able to make a good site on our own and slowly we have introduced it to the print journalists and they have grown to accept it as part of the paper."  According to Gié, as of today still not all print journalists contribute to the website, but most of them are drawn to the quality of the site and they are "eager to participate."

The other new media: E-papers and Mobile technology

As for the electronic newspaper, Gié believes (for now) it is a niche technology, and "as long as the designs remain as they are, a little heavy, in black and white, with a navigation system that is not very intuitive, it will remain a niche technology - for businessmen and for people who travel."  But, he finds the e-paper to be a technology that has the potential to develop into something very interesting for newspapers.

Gié believes that mobile phones are "very different, because traffic on mobiles is very important," and there have been significant improvements in mobile technology in the last few years.  Before, all the "operations and platforms were locked by the operators, you had to pass through the operators, it was complicated and expensive."  But now, there are mobile sites and portals that are designed for mobile users and allow them to easily access content online.  According to Gié, because of this, Le Figaro's iPhone site now has an audience of over 100,000 per month and growing since its launch.

Social Networking with Mon Figaro

Gié explained that interaction with readers is key at Le Figaro.  So in 2007, Le Figaro became the first mainstream news site in France to open all of its articles to comments.  Because it worked so well, with over one million comments on the site in the first year, they realized that it was a system that was very important to their readers - their ability to express themselves and interact with the content.  

They also realized that "people really wanted to communicate amongst themselves, and they started to communicate with each other and we really wanted to give them the tools to better manage their commentary."  So in November 2008, Le Figaro launched social networking tool Mon Figaro using a basic platform, which allows "users on Figaro.fr to place other users as favorites and to follow their activities."  Gié confirmed that 2009 will bring additional developments to Mon Figaro.

Personalized News

Gié believes that personalized news is "important but not fundamental."  For the last two years, Le Figaro has been allowing readers to personalize their page through Net Vibes.  However, Gié feels that because there is so much information on the Internet, it is hard for users to select what is worth reading.  For the most part, they select who is going to organize and sort the information for them, in most cases a trusted site like Le Figaro or The New York Times.  Otherwise, they have to select and find the information themselves, which is always  time consuming.  Gié sees Le Figaro's online role as a trusted brand that "provides news based on the notion that our readers want us to select it for them."

Le Figaro's active development of both its print product and website is admirable, and it will be interesting to see whether the paper maintains its separated operations or follows the example of other high profile papers such as the Washington Post, the Guardian, and El Pais, who, after initial reluctance, eventually caved in and integrated their newsrooms. 

The Women's Institute is campaigning to prevent sex ads, which "could involve trafficked women," from local newspapers in the UK, Hold the Front Page is reporting.

The WI said it would "name and shame" newspaper publishers that run such ads, and are planning to collate members' findings for the campaign.  Members will be looking for "key phrases" in sex ads, and will send letters to editors.

The Newspaper Society vowed to work with the government to "issue guidance to the local press."  Several groups, including Newsquest and MEN Media, have stopped carrying the ads.

Source:  Hold the Front Page

The Indian Readership Survey, a sampling of trends in newspapers in the Himachal state, demonstrates that a differing family structure, increase in female readership and youth favoring the Hindi language over English are all factors in the country's media industry.

Total readership is down in the Himachal state by nearly 700,000.  Both Hindi and English dailies have lost readers, 11,000 and 49,000, respectively, since the last survey, according to the report.

Spot.Us is an innovative new sight that recently won funding and support from the highly respected Knight Foundation. It is garnering much attention as the concept essentially transforms the idea of community reporting and reinvigorates investigative reporting on a local level. However, would it be attracting this much support and attention if the newspaper business model weren't struggling?

The concept

Spot.Us allows anyone to send in a story idea to the site as long as it is a local issue affecting the San Francisco Bay area. Spot.Us calculate how much it would cost to investigate said story and the ideas is then "pitched" on the site, if other users of the site support the story idea then they can donate money to pay for a freelance journalist to cover it. It is then published on the site and other news organisations can publish it as well. The point being, some stories that are interesting to the public are being ignored by news organisations, this is an opportunity for the public at large to read a story that they want written about. The public becomes the editor.

Spot.Us deserves credit for coming up with an innovative way of bringing journalism back to the community and reinvigorating local investigative reporting. Furthermore, it is an original concept that has won the support of not only the Knight Foundation, but also Jeff Jarvis and other significant names in the journalism community.

Will the public pay?

While Spot.Us is undoubtedly exciting, there does appear to be some issues with the concept. For example, the organisation is currently garnering a lot of press attention and is therefore very much in the public eye, but what happens after the media attention dies down? Will people continue to visit the site: how will they maintain public interest?
 
Furthermore, it will be very difficult for Spot.Us to maintain its integrity and not be manipulated by outside groups who want certain stories investigated for their own agenda. It may be difficult for it to stop itself becoming little more than part of a lobbying machine for various interest groups.

The Editors Weblog spoke to David Cohn - the CEO and sole employee of Spot.Us - about these issues and the thinking behind his project.

EW: If newspapers were not suffering financially in the US, do you think there would still be a place in the market for an organisation such as yours?
 
DC: I do think there would be a place for an organization such as mine - but I don't think it would be as urgent. Part of what Spot.Us does is democractize the media by allowing the audience to determine the news agenda. Traditionally .001 percent of the population determined the news agenda, we called them "editors." But with Spot.Us the public can set the news agenda because now they have a freelance budget as well.

EW: Do you have any guidelines on what you will or will not investigate or write about, eg, an oil company wants you to write a piece proving that oil drilling doesn't hurt the environment?

DC: Yes: They aren't guidelines but categories that all pitches have to fall in. This was to ensure that we don't get pitches that aren't civic journalism. The categories are education, environment, city government, public health - etc.

EW: How will you maintain Spot.Us's integrity, to stop it from being used as a tool for lobby groups or marketing?

DC: We have an algorithm that required a diverse group of people to support a story or it does not make it on to our homepage as a pitch. Right now my algorithm is very simple, firstly, the site is new and I have a small pool of people visiting the site in general. As the site becomes more popular it is just a matter of tweaking the algorithm to ensure that you always have a diverse group of people.

EW: Is this something that you are aware of?

DC: It is something that I am very aware of. I would say I am concerned about it. I understand the concern and the fear...

But I am more concerned that we are going to find out that the public are just not going to donate at all, that's the fear. People think that they're going to be clambering, we will have to build bridges so that we slow them down they are going to be donating so much money towards our work. I think it is actually going to be the opposite and that we are going to have to do a lot of outreach to try and find people who would benefit and see the public good of donating to journalism.

EW: There is a lot of media attention surrounding your organisation right now, but how you are going to maintain that when, say, the interest in your organisation has died down from the media perspective. How will you maintain interest with the community?

DC: We are going to be doing some community organising. This is where it gets interesting right? So, like the San Francisco Commutative campaign that we did over the summer and we raised $2,500 from 74 different people who gave $34 each. If we were to do that again next year, the first thing I would do is go to the League of Women Voters. It's an organisation with a branch in San Francisco and say they have - I am just guessing here - 1,000 members in the bay area, they have a large group of people who would be interested in fact checking for the political adverts and I can go to the League of Women Voters and say, "Hey, can you help go and spread the word about this to." Then they spread the word to their members, and say even 30 of them thought it were a good idea and donated $25 each. That is a decent amount of money right there. That and also social networking and things like that.

EW: Are you going to try and build a relationship with the local media?

DC: Yes, definatly. If there is a pitch that a local newspaper would be interested in running, they have a vested interest in seeing community members donating towards it so they could help spread the word about the pitch.

EW: Can you explain how you monetise Spot.Us?
 
DC: The same way that Kiva.org monetizes their site. If somebody is donating $25 then all of their money goes to where they want it to go, but before they are done with the transaction we also ask that they donate 10% or $2.50 to the nonprofit organization that is Spot.Us. This extra 10% is optional. Kiva.org does the same thing and they found that something close to 90% of people will go ahead and give the extra 10% to the organization.

EW: What inspired you to set up Spot.Us?

DC: A few things. First - I was a freelance journalist for a long time and I know how hard it can be to make it as such. I wanted to create tools that enabled freelancers to do their job easier.

I was also the research assistant for a guy named Jeff Howe who was writing a book on "Crowd sourcing." I was researching for the chapter on Crowd funding and I began to learn about sites like Kiva.org and DonorsChoose.org. These are micro-finance sites for teachers or for people in third world countries. They are hugely successful. I wondered if it would be possible for journalist to also tap into the gift economy, which in America was $300,000 billion last year.

I have worked in citizen journalism in the past. I love it and strongly believe in it - but I also know the limitations of citizen journalism. I wanted to find a way that journalism could be participatory but also stretch to do some of the harder journalism that requires professionals to stick to a story for a longer period of time.

EW: Can you talk me though how you organise your staffers?
 
Spot.Us is not a newsroom. It is a platform or Internet tool. All pitches on Spot.Us are from freelance journalists in the Bay Area. They are not staff reporters for Spot.Us.

EW: How big is your team and how do you contact the editors

DC: I am the only staff person on Spot.Us. The developers and designers are contractors. All the pitches you see on Spot.Us are from independent freelance journalists - and are contractors. We assign an editor to each story - but the editor is just another journalist within our system. Again, Spot.Us is NOT a newsroom or news organization as traditionally understood. We are a platform. Just as YouTube is not a film production company, but they host video, Spot.Us is not a content producing organization, but we host the production of content.

EW: What technology is powering the platform you are using?
 
DC: The site is built with Ruby on Rails. I was thinking about using Drupal but in the end used Ruby on Rails and so far I am very happy with that decision.

The development firm is called Hashrocket. My hosting service is Engine Yard.
 

While newspapers have been fighting off declining circulation and an aging readership, social networking sites are thriving. De Telegraaf, a leading Dutch broadsheet, has tapped into this popular medium by teaming up with popular Dutch social networking site, Hyves, for the Euro 2008 football tournament and the Olympics. In so doing, Telegraaf.nl gained access to Hyves 7 million users.

The Editors Weblog spoke to Telegraaf.nl's Publisher, Lara Ankersmit, to find out how the project came about, the impact it had on its newsroom, and the benefits of working with social media.

"Brainstorm"

When Telegraaf.nl first met with Hyves back in September 2007, it was simply to have "a conversation and a brainstorm." This initial conversation led to the two companies building a partnership that would not only drive traffic to the newspapers' web edition and enable Hyves to increase its product offering to its users, but also revolutionise and redefine the relationship between newspapers and social networking sites. This partnership has now become something of a blueprint within the industry for other newspapers looking to tap into the success of this new media platform.

"We don't care where people read our news; as long as they do read it."

Explaining the thinking behind the partnership, Ankersmit says, "We don't care where people read our news; as long as they do read it." Telegraaf has come to terms with the changes the internet has brought to the newspaper industry and adapted its product offering and thinking accordingly. Furthermore, the Telegraaf is putting its product on different platforms independent of news aggregators, and is thereby controlling how its brand is presented.

Specialised Content

To launch this innovative scheme, the two companies needed a suitably big story; therefore, the launching pad for Telegraaf's content on the Hyves site was the Euro 2008 football tournament and the Olympic games in Beijing. Telegraaf's content for Hyves was not lifted directly from its web edition: the news provider moved out of its "comfort zone" and changed its tone and content appropriately for the medium.

Telegraaf.nl and Hyves worked together to produce a fantasy football game, which was hosted on the Hyves platform. This fantasy football game proved to be a great success, achieving almost 170,000 participants. The rules are the same as other fantasy football competitions, with users selecting teams and predicting which country would win the tournament. Furthermore, Telegraaf provided editorial pieces to build on the playing experience. While playing the game, Hyves users could also choose friends from their social network to play with; the end result of this being that almost 45% of the players joined the game because of a recommendation from a friend on the social network site.

After the success of the Euro 2008 competition, the teams at Teegraaf and Hyves are working together again on a game for this year's football season (till May 2009). At going to press, the game has almost 32,000 participants.

The game comes with all kinds of statistics, eg, a player can see how good/bad they perform compared to the Hyves community, other women, other participants who are of a certain star sign, who live in the same city, and so forth. Teegraaf have not yet used this data for online content as the season has just begun. However, during Euro 2008 Telegraaf used such data for stories in the newspaper and the website.

For the Olympics, the newspaper provided tailored coverage of the games in Beijing, with the Telegraaf's sports desk working on the coverage. The blogs produced for Hyves in Beijing were also published on the newspaper's web site.

Just as content for the web edition is different from the print edition, content for the social network platform also differs from the news website. As Hyves is a more informal website than a straight web edition of a newspaper, the Telegraaf needed to provide the site with something a little different. For example, in the print edition Telegraaf will feature one photo within a story, on the web version it will have five photos, but for Hyves Telegraaf it will feature twenty photos. The style of photos will also be different from Telegraaf.nl, so there will be more behind the scenes shots or photos of the journalist travelling to, for example, the Olympic Games.

The newspaper also customised its blogs for Hyves, requesting that Telegraaf journalists at the Olympic games provide blogs from a more personal perspective.

Adapt the newsroom - stay flexible

This coverage from Telegraaf.nl did increase the workload (for example, increased blog content) for the newsroom, but Ankersmit reports that the staffers were enthusiastic about the Hyves project. Ankersmit also told the Weblog that the newspaper hired two journalism students who focused on uploading pictures and monitoring the Hyves site.
The sales and marketing team and project managers were also working in the background to ensure a buzz around the new product.

Payoff

The benefits of this relationship to the two media companies are clear: Telegraaf is able to tap into Hyves 7 million users and open up its content to a younger audience who may not have considered reading the newspaper previously and Hyves is provided with high quality content from one of the Netherlands' most respected newspapers. During the project, almost 20% of the incoming traffic to Telesport.nl (the sports pages of Telegraaf.nl) came through the Hyves site. Before the project, the traffic coming via the Hyves site was negligible.

This partnership also helped the Telegraaf re-brand itself and present itself as a modern news organisation. The newspaper had a rather "old fashioned" image before the project, but this initiative made people look at Telegraaf in a new light. The games on the Hyves site also got people talking about the site on the internet and the project became a topic of conversation around water-coolers in offices.

Despite these changes at the Telegraaf, Ankersmit says that "news is still our core product," it is simply changing the way that it connects with its audience. Anksersmit told the Editors Weblog that it is important that news organisations "extend their brand" and its relationship with Hyves got people used to reading Telegraaf news on different platforms.

The future

Building on the success of its partnership with Hyves, the newspaper site is currently moving ahead with plans for its Mobile smart phone coverage. Ankersmit reports that while smart phone content was previously just read by business users, the introduction of a flat-rate fee from mobile companies has opened up the platform to a wider audience. Telegraaf has also noted that readers are using the site in a different way, they now read content in a similar fashion to that on the website. Ankersmit expects Mobile to be increasingly popular in the years ahead as it becomes increasingly commercial, and when it does, the Telegraaf will once again be ready to break new ground.

The Liverpool Echo announced plans to relaunch with a new design and added content.  The launch is planned for October 27, 2008.

According to the paper's website the "full makeover" of the Echo is designed to keep "with the pace, energy, positivity and drive of the regeneration of our city." 

The Vatican's L'Osservatore Romano, the 147-year old newspaper of record will now carry international news stories and more articles written by women according to the Wall Street Journal. The paper's publisher, Pope Benedict XVI is said to have requested the changes.

When the paper was founded in 1861, it was the "mouthpiece" for Vatican news and reported on the daily happenings of the pope.  

The paper has long been a subject of criticism; in 1961 Cardinal Montini, who became Pope Paul VI wrote, "a serious newspaper, a grave newspaper, but who would ever read it on the tram or at the bar, who would ever strike up a discussion about it?"

77 percent of Koreans use the Internet and spend an average of 13.7 hours online each week, according to a government poll. The figures are based on a survey that the Korea Communications Commission conducted jointly with the National Internet Development Agency of Korea.

The Korea Communications Commission report that 60 percent of Internet users read newspapers online and 58 percent of all Internet users used Cyworld's mini homepages or blogs, while 50 percent of Internet users use online cafes or clubs. Koreans in there 20s are the biggest users of online communities, with 82 percent of them using blogs or mini homepages and 76 percent of them using internet cafes or clubs.

35,360,000 of Koreans use the Internet, which is up 0.8 percent from a year ago. 41,466 Koreans participated in the poll in June and July.

100 percent of teens, 20s and 30s access the Web, and 82 percent of children between the ages of three and nine went online.

Eighty-two percent of those in there forties use the internet, while 49 percent of those in there fifties go online. Internet users were defined as those who had been online in the past month.

The poll revealed a digital divide between educated and uneducated, and women and men.

Source: Asia Media

The Boston Globe announces that it has launched OT, a new sports weekly, that will come out every Thursday and will be priced at 50 cents. OT, which stands for "Our Town/Our Teams," will be printed in 24 full-color pages as an oversized tabloid and will have its own online counterpart called OT Online, reports Boston.com. Its main audience is considered to be "voracious sports fans."

La Parisienne announced plans to double in pages and become a monthly publication on October 2.  La Parisienne is currently a quarterly magazine supplement for women that is distributed with Le Parisien.

The magazine will be distributed for free on Saturdays, once a month, with Le Parisien and Aujourd'hui en France.  It will increase to 48 pages instead of 24; ten to fifteen of which will be advertisements.  La Parisienne also plans to improve the quality of their editorial content and seeks to become a leading magazine for women.

Source: Presse News

Ultra-orthodox papers in Israel refuse to publish images of Tzipi Livni, candidate for Prime Minister, for religious reasons, a move which the country's feminists called "laughably ludicrous," according to Mail Online.

Brussels-based daily newspaper DeMorgen reports a Saturday edition makeover that features a navigator which takes up nearly half of the page and announces the content inside. Furthermore, the paper launched Wax, a new section that is geared towards women but is "not only for women."

Internet users who downloaded podcasts to watch or listen to later increased from 12% to 19% since last year, according to a study by The Pew Internet and American Life Project. In early 2006, only 7% of Web users downloaded podcasts for later use.